2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-27455-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying Cognitive Grammar in the Classroom: Teaching English Tense and Aspect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
30
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…An imperfective aspect makes explicit reference to the internal temporal perspective of the situation, and enables one to view the event to be in a middle stage of completion (Comrie, 1976). Although tense and aspect are different grammatical phenomena they do interact a complementary manner for temporal anchoring of events (Croft, 1998;Ter Meulen, 1995;Radden & Dirven, 2007, Part III; see also Bielak & Pawlak, 2013 for a review from the ELT perspective). Their interface works differently in different languages (Comrie, 1976, Ch.…”
Section: Time In Linguistic Construalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An imperfective aspect makes explicit reference to the internal temporal perspective of the situation, and enables one to view the event to be in a middle stage of completion (Comrie, 1976). Although tense and aspect are different grammatical phenomena they do interact a complementary manner for temporal anchoring of events (Croft, 1998;Ter Meulen, 1995;Radden & Dirven, 2007, Part III; see also Bielak & Pawlak, 2013 for a review from the ELT perspective). Their interface works differently in different languages (Comrie, 1976, Ch.…”
Section: Time In Linguistic Construalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of quasi-experimental studies (Bielak and Pawlak, 2013;Boers, 2011;Hung, 2017;Evans and Tyler, 2005;Huong, 2005;Song, Schnotz and Juchem-Grundman, 2015;Tyler, Mueller andHo, 2011 &Vasiljevic, 2011) were found relevant references for this study as they applied CL to ELT (English language teaching) in EFL (Englishas-a-foreign-language) con-texts. These studies had things in common.…”
Section: Spatial Domain Abstract Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study added two productive tasks after instruction (Harmer, 2009& Norris & Ortega, 2000. A number of EFL studies inspired from cognitive linguistics had also provided productive tasks in the treatment (Bielak & Pawlak, 2013;Condon, 2002;Hama, 2005& Tyler et al, 2011). The traditional instruction was explicit and inductive.…”
Section: Instructional Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the majority of cases, the grammatical descriptions informing formfocused instruction derive from the traditional structuralist paradigm, which often neglects the semantic side of grammar by dealing with it only in general terms or ignoring important aspects thereof (Bielak & Pawlak, 2013). Recent years, however, have seen some renewed interest in the insights and pedagogical use of more meaning-oriented theories of language, such as systemic functional linguistics (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2004) or cognitive linguistics (Geeraerts, 2006;Janssen & Redeker, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These may in turn incorporate a variety of factors governing the use of grammatical features including both linguistic and extralinguistic context and the perspective of the speaker. The potential usefulness of pointing such elements of the semantics of grammar to learners has frequently been endorsed in recent years (see e.g., Larsen-Freeman, 2003 and most of the sources listed earlier in this paragraph), but the practical efficacy of doing so has been tackled and tested much less frequently (some recent examples are Bielak & Pawlak, 2013;Król-Markefka, 2010;Tyler, Mueller, & Ho, 2010;White, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%