2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying different resampling strategies in machine learning models to predict head-cut gully erosion susceptibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Needing at least two predictor variables to run is its disadvantage. Wang et al (2021) have used this model to apply different resampling methods to map gully erosion probability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Needing at least two predictor variables to run is its disadvantage. Wang et al (2021) have used this model to apply different resampling methods to map gully erosion probability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the sigmoid-fitting method is that it can estimate the posterior probabilities well while maintaining the sparsity of the SVM. This is implemented through the Libsvm library function in Matlab to complete the program [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For evaluating the regression methods, we split the dataset in data for training (60%), validation (20%) and testing (20%) not random, but always all samples of a single casting together. The dataset for training and validation is extended to a 10,000 × 46 matrix by a bootstrap based sample augmentation by resampling [45][46][47][48]. 45 apparently relevant input parameters, listed in Table 2 except nodularity, were used to predict nodularity by statistical methods.…”
Section: Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%