2016
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying dynamic species distribution modelling to lek‐mating species

Abstract: Aim Lek‐mating species, in which males congregate to display and copulate with females, are of long‐standing behavioural, economic and conservation interest. Monitoring programs often target areas in which these species aggregate for mating (lek arenas) because of the often cryptic behaviours of these species when away from lek arenas. Due to survey methodologies and the ecology of many lek‐mating species, the building of species distribution models (SDMs) requires researchers to consider issues that are gener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decades, SDMs have been erected like an efficient technic for improving the knowledge on species potential distribution (Hidalgo et al 2008;López-Tirado & Hidalgo 2014;Báez et al 2016;Hemeri et al 2016;López-Tirado & Hidalgo 2016a;Sadoti et al 2016). Thus, they correlate the acknowledged current distribution of a given species with climatic conditions in the main; in other words, cartography of suitability is resulted from a list of explanatory variables (Mateo et al 2011;Mellert et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, SDMs have been erected like an efficient technic for improving the knowledge on species potential distribution (Hidalgo et al 2008;López-Tirado & Hidalgo 2014;Báez et al 2016;Hemeri et al 2016;López-Tirado & Hidalgo 2016a;Sadoti et al 2016). Thus, they correlate the acknowledged current distribution of a given species with climatic conditions in the main; in other words, cartography of suitability is resulted from a list of explanatory variables (Mateo et al 2011;Mellert et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We speculate that these changes in extirpation risk are likely linked to the effect of drought (near‐term habitat effects), and reduction in carrying capacity. The latter may be indicative of long‐term changes in landscape composition or effects of ongoing changes such as expanded energy development and expansion of conifer perches for predatory birds due to fire suppression, which is affecting space usable by prairie‐chickens (Ross et al , Sadoti et al , Spencer et al ). Thus, improvements in carrying capacity as the drought eased may have reduced the extirpation risk, but did not alleviate reductions in overall carrying capacity because of long‐term changes in available habitat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%