2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0141-1136(02)00219-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying foraminiferal stratigraphy as a biomarker for heavy metal contamination and mining impact in a fiord in West Greenland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies report a fast repopulation of the tailings by the benthic community after deposition has ceased [104], while other studies present data which indicate that benthic community structures suffered strongly from contamination and open the way to opportunistic species, with a reduction in biodiversity [100,105]. Toxicity effects were detected in some species [62,94,106]; (4) Failure of the tailings tubing (technical problems, tides, earth quakes, tsunamis or storm events) and subsequent dispersion of the tailings in the sea without any control and associated pollutions [61,62]; (5) Dispersion of the tailings to greater distances than predicted by models and increase of turbidity and plume shearing (e.g., Misima Mine, Papua New Guinea); (6) Re-deposition of the tailings in more shallow levels, due to upwelling and unforeseen currents (e.g., Island Copper Mine, Canada; Bahía Portman, Spain). This will increase the risk of sulphide oxidation in the euphotic zone; (7) Toxicity of the flotation reagents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies report a fast repopulation of the tailings by the benthic community after deposition has ceased [104], while other studies present data which indicate that benthic community structures suffered strongly from contamination and open the way to opportunistic species, with a reduction in biodiversity [100,105]. Toxicity effects were detected in some species [62,94,106]; (4) Failure of the tailings tubing (technical problems, tides, earth quakes, tsunamis or storm events) and subsequent dispersion of the tailings in the sea without any control and associated pollutions [61,62]; (5) Dispersion of the tailings to greater distances than predicted by models and increase of turbidity and plume shearing (e.g., Misima Mine, Papua New Guinea); (6) Re-deposition of the tailings in more shallow levels, due to upwelling and unforeseen currents (e.g., Island Copper Mine, Canada; Bahía Portman, Spain). This will increase the risk of sulphide oxidation in the euphotic zone; (7) Toxicity of the flotation reagents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar conditions occurred in the Chilean case Ensenada Chapaco (dissolution and reductive dissolution). One, two, and three decades since operation at Black Angel ceased, independent scientific studies showed that the pollution persists [93][94][95][96][97][98] and is having significant long-term effects on the benthic macro fauna through the presence of heavy metals [99,100]. The study of Josefson et al [100] showed that 33 years after deposition ceased at the Black Angel Mine, degradation of the integrity of the benthic community was directly correlated with persisting, high Pb concentrations in the sediment (>200 mg/kg).…”
Section: Black Angel Mine Greenland (Ceased Since 1990)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence or absence of key taxa, as well as their abundance and distribution , often can be statistically linked to contaminant sources. Response of foraminiferal assemblages to contaminant gradients have been described and such response can be represented by drastic assemblages changes [40], step wise faunal changes [41] or fluctuations in faunal assemblages and species abundance[42].…”
Section: Organic Matter ( Mll -1 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alterations and rapid changes in ecological parameters, such as salinity variations, temperature, solubility of calcium carbonate, dissolved oxygen, illumination, anthropogenic heavy metal pollution or heavy metals carried by groundwater are suggested to cause abnormal test development in foraminifers (Boltovskoy et al 1991, Almogi-Labin et al 1992, Yanko et al 1998, Stouff et al, 1999a, 1999b, Geslin et al 2000, 2002, Elberling et al 2003. Abnormal test morphology have been reported from many locations worldwide (Cushman 1929, Cimerman and Langer 1991, Loeblich and Tappan 1994 and are known to be common in certain foraminifer genera and species (Geslin et al 1998, Stouff et al 1999a, 1999b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%