2013
DOI: 10.3233/ais-130209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying model-driven engineering to a method for systematic treatment of NFRs in AmI systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the artifacts for evaluating IoT applications, we identified 2 tools, 6 approaches, 1 method and 1 process [Ruiz-López et al 2013] that were used during the reported evaluations. We noticed that most of the approaches, methods, and tools focused on the requirements' elicitation stage and not on evaluating if the IoT application meet the NFRs previously established.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the artifacts for evaluating IoT applications, we identified 2 tools, 6 approaches, 1 method and 1 process [Ruiz-López et al 2013] that were used during the reported evaluations. We noticed that most of the approaches, methods, and tools focused on the requirements' elicitation stage and not on evaluating if the IoT application meet the NFRs previously established.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addiction, we only identified one process that evaluates whether the system meets its NFRs, the MD-UBI process [Ruiz-López et al 2013]. This process aims to support developers and evaluators in elicitation, representation, and evaluation of requirements, focusing on NFRs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%