2009
DOI: 10.1002/dac.1087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying multiple description coding to enhance the streaming scalability on CDN‐P2P network

Abstract: SUMMARYOwing to the wide deployment of broadband networks, information can now be rapidly disseminated all over the world. Only the content of static texts and pictures has not yet met users' demands. Along with the rapid advance of computer-related technologies, how to efficiently provide multimedia content for a large number of heterogeneous users on the Internet, especially videos, has become a noticeable issue. In this paper, we discuss the adaptation of multiple description coding (MDC) for the loopback b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) N is the number of destination nodes in the tree network (i.e., fo_1 × fo_2), fo_1 and fo_2 are, respectively, the fan-out on level 1 (i.e., 5) and level 2 (i.e., 2), up is the upload bandwidth, peer_a is the fraction of peer nodes at the destination that are able to distribute received video layers and peer_l1 is the number of level 1 nodes with peer functionality. The average number of received video layers I (equation (21)) is the minimum over four arguments.…”
Section: Solving Our Problem On a Tree-video Distribution Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) N is the number of destination nodes in the tree network (i.e., fo_1 × fo_2), fo_1 and fo_2 are, respectively, the fan-out on level 1 (i.e., 5) and level 2 (i.e., 2), up is the upload bandwidth, peer_a is the fraction of peer nodes at the destination that are able to distribute received video layers and peer_l1 is the number of level 1 nodes with peer functionality. The average number of received video layers I (equation (21)) is the minimum over four arguments.…”
Section: Solving Our Problem On a Tree-video Distribution Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the level 1 peer exhibits no peer functionality, the average received quality for that sub-tree is not larger than dividing the bandwidth contributed by the injector peer and the level 1 peer, over all destinations that are part of the sub-tree as expressed by equation (20). Because the destination's peer node can contribute to this sub-tree, the fraction of peer nodes times the uplink has to be added.…”
Section: Solving Our Problem On a Tree-video Distribution Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By preventing the prefixes announced by edge networks from entering core networks, global routable prefixes in the core network can be greatly reduced. On the other side, with increasingly voluminous and dominant video traffic provided by multimedia content providers, and effective support for multimedia content with end devices especially for mobile devices [4], efficient support for delivering such content becomes a challenging problem and various content dissemination schemes based on the current Internet architecture, such as content distribution network (CDN) and peer to peer, have been proposed [5,6]. In addition to this, for better supporting content delivery, the network resources are expected to be utilized more efficiently [7], and information centric networking architecture has recently been proposed [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…

As one of key differences from traditional Internet, information-centric networking introduces the network built-in cache in network nodes. As one of the key differences from traditional Internet, ICN introduces the cache in network nodes, although the cache issue is not a new topic and has been already widely studied by researchers in the field such as content delivery network and peer to peer [17][18][19][20][21]. In this paper, we try to look insight into such an issue and propose a way of cache collaboration not only for the on-path but also for the off-path routers.

…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%