1993
DOI: 10.1109/43.215002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying simulated evolution to high level synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We tested our method on a suite of design examples that include the differential equation example, the fifth order elliptical wave filter, the Facet example, the AR filter, and the discrete cosine transform (DCT) benchmark example. We compare our results to PSGA Synth, 14 ADaPAS, 11 HAL, 7 simulated evolution method (SE), 12 Splicer, 21 Facet, 22 MABAL, 23 Salsa, 6 and GABIND. 16 All synthesis results have been produced for the 0.35 µm component library from austria microsystems 18 with some component costs shown in Table 1 for illustration purposes.…”
Section: Benchmark Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We tested our method on a suite of design examples that include the differential equation example, the fifth order elliptical wave filter, the Facet example, the AR filter, and the discrete cosine transform (DCT) benchmark example. We compare our results to PSGA Synth, 14 ADaPAS, 11 HAL, 7 simulated evolution method (SE), 12 Splicer, 21 Facet, 22 MABAL, 23 Salsa, 6 and GABIND. 16 All synthesis results have been produced for the 0.35 µm component library from austria microsystems 18 with some component costs shown in Table 1 for illustration purposes.…”
Section: Benchmark Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The second group tries to address the global optimality and performs simultaneous functional unit and register binding. Representative algorithms include simulated annealing [7][8] [18], simulated evolution [21], and ILP (integer linear programming) [13] [26]. Since the subtasks of high-level synthesis are highly interrelated, simultaneous optimization approaches try to consider all the involved optimization parameters together and explore the combined solution space for overall better results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group performs simultaneous functional unit and register binding. Representative algorithms include simulated annealing [5,9,24], simulated evolution [29], and integer linear programming (ILP) [13,35]. Since the subtasks of behavioral synthesis are highly interrelated, simultaneous optimization approaches try to consider all the involved optimization parameters together for globally better results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%