2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the social cognitive model of career self-management to career exploration and decision-making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

35
266
3
31

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(335 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
35
266
3
31
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the ability beliefs, the focus should be placed on the growth of children's/students' intrinsic beliefs. Lent, Ezeofor, Morrison, Penn and Ireland (2016) also mention that decisional self-efficacy factor and the established measure of career decision self-efficacy are strongly correlated, and they generate theoretic consistency in relation with the measures of outcome expectations, social support, conscientiousness, exploration goals, prior engagement in career exploration, decisional anxiety, and level of career decidedness. Peña-Calvo, Inda-Caro, Rodríguez-Menéndez, and Fernández-García (2016) stress that Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) states that career interest is influenced by four cognitive variables: self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, interests, and goals.…”
Section: Career Counseling and Career Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As for the ability beliefs, the focus should be placed on the growth of children's/students' intrinsic beliefs. Lent, Ezeofor, Morrison, Penn and Ireland (2016) also mention that decisional self-efficacy factor and the established measure of career decision self-efficacy are strongly correlated, and they generate theoretic consistency in relation with the measures of outcome expectations, social support, conscientiousness, exploration goals, prior engagement in career exploration, decisional anxiety, and level of career decidedness. Peña-Calvo, Inda-Caro, Rodríguez-Menéndez, and Fernández-García (2016) stress that Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) states that career interest is influenced by four cognitive variables: self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, interests, and goals.…”
Section: Career Counseling and Career Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Personal communications from colleagues knowledgeable in the field (Lenz, Osborn, and Sampson) indicated that only the CDMSES was a familiar instrument. Also other versions of included scales exist (e.g., Betz, Klein, & Taylor, 1996), and Lent et al (2016) have used a newly developed scale tapping this construct. Lastly, only the Career Decision Self-Efficacy scale appears in the National Career Development Association's Counselor's Guide to Career Assessment Instruments (Wood & Hays, 2013).…”
Section: Evaluate Diversity In Ms Us Ts Os and Ssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Career-Exploration and Decision Self-Efficacy Scale (CEDSE, Lent et al, 2016). Avalia a autoeficácia na exploração (8 itens; e.g., "Identificar carreiras que melhor fazem uso das suas capacidades") e tomada de decisão (4 itens; e.g., "Lidar com a deceção se a primeira escolha não funcionar"), com resposta numa escala de cinco pontos (1=nada confiante; 5=completamente confiante), e valores de fiabilidade satisfatórios (α = .94 e α= .96) no estudo original e neste estudo (α = .95 e α= .90).…”
Section: E Neste Estudo (α = 83)unclassified
“…Neste estudo, a conscienciosidade foi a dimensão da personalidade que apresentou relações significativas previstas com a auto-eficácia na exploração e decisão vocacional, as quais estabelecem associações significativas com as intenções em explorar e tomar decisões de carreira (H1). A conscienciosidade favorece a autoeficácia em tarefas de planeamento de carreira, já que envolve a capacidade de organização e persistência, permitindo sustentar o sentido de competência em tarefas vocacionais, como a exploração e a decisão (Lent et al, 2016). O suporte social afecta também positivamente a autoeficácia e, negativamente, a ansiedade decisional (H2).…”
Section: Discussão E Conclusãounclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation