2011
DOI: 10.5210/ojphi.v3i2.3656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the XForms Standard to Public Health Case Reporting and Alerting

Abstract: Notifiable condition reporting and alerting are two important public health functions. Today, a variety of methods are used to transfer these types of information. The increasing use of electronic health record systems by healthcare providers makes new types of electronic communication possible. We used the XForms standard and nationally recognized technical profiles to demonstrate the communication of both notifiable condition reports and patient-tailored public health alerts. This demonstration of bi-directi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to this, though it is not a defined standard used in healthcare right now, there is an increasing adaptation of Xforms in the industry [1]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to this, though it is not a defined standard used in healthcare right now, there is an increasing adaptation of Xforms in the industry [1]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the Center for disease control and prevention (CDC) in collaboration with the Council for state and territorial epidemiologists (CSTE) have proposed a model for the exchange, sharing and retrieval of notifiable condition reporting from an electronic health record [1]. This suggests that electronic notifiable condition reporting may soon be feasible at larger scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the many lasting legacies of the 9/11 attacks and anthrax mailings in 2001 is how it highlighted the need for better preparedness, coordination, communication, and countermeasures development in the US (Annas 2002). The 2001 response to the anthrax attacks relied heavily on the use of electronic communications systems; however, the effectiveness of message coverage suffered due to a lack of contact information, old email addresses, and incomplete registries (Hills et al 2011). Over the last decade, actors involved in public health emergency preparedness have developed and revised emergency operations plans, acquired new technology for information sharing, hired additional personnel, and enhanced training programs.…”
Section: Importance Of Information Sharing In Pandemic Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One strategy is to improve the consistency of health messages by reducing the level of redundancy, as research found that during the H1N1 pandemic in 2009-2010 health care providers became desensitized to information because of an excess of alerts. Hills et al (2011) also note that information needs to be provided in an orderly manner to avoid alert fatigue.…”
Section: Importance Of Information Sharing In Pandemic Responsementioning
confidence: 99%