2018
DOI: 10.1080/14623943.2018.1538954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appreciative student voice model – reflecting on an appreciative inquiry research method for facilitating student voice processes

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to describe and discuss Appreciative Inquiry (AI) as a research method to facilitate student voice in school research. The paper sets out a model for conducting AI in schools. The research questions identified are: What are the researcher's reflections when using Appreciative Inquiry in school research? What challenges and opportunities can be found when using Appreciative Inquiry in research processes with students? An application of the model will be presented and problematised. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has been recommended as a strength-based model to improve school climate [ 27 ]. The 5-D method is a multimodal approach helpful for facilitating students’ exploration of school experiences [ 28 ]. An earlier version of the 5-D method, the AI 4-D cycle, was used to capture teachers’ experiences and perspectives about positive school development [ 29 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been recommended as a strength-based model to improve school climate [ 27 ]. The 5-D method is a multimodal approach helpful for facilitating students’ exploration of school experiences [ 28 ]. An earlier version of the 5-D method, the AI 4-D cycle, was used to capture teachers’ experiences and perspectives about positive school development [ 29 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young people with an active interest in mental health promotion demonstrate a desire to be involved, and researchers need training on how best to actively and meaningfully involve young people in mental health research (Mawn et al 2015). This cooperative and participatory approach with young people is echoed in the body of work on student voice (see, for example, Bergmark and Kostenius 2018;Cook-Sather 2006;Mitra and Serriere 2012). Student voice goes beyond receiving input from students, also allowing young people to share their opinions on school issues with administrators and faculty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, AI encourages organizations to identify strengths and imagine possibilities to outgrow problems and realize visions (Tschannen-Moran and Tschannen-Moran, 2011). AI requires its participants to be involved in an iterative improvement process often called 4D- or 5D-cycle including four or five phases of Define, Discovery, Dream, Design and Destiny (Bergmark and Kostenius, 2018; Lilja and Richardsson, 2012). The AI process originally contains four phases, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The module in which the handout is used is about creating computer-based models to simulate and improve manufacturing systems (Figures 1 and 2 present extracts of the handout that required improvement). According to Bergmark and Kostenius (2018), “Problems can be solved through valuing the best of what is and envisioning how the future might look like” (Bergmark and Kostenius, 2018, p. 624).…”
Section: Appreciative Inquiry In Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%