2021
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-236064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approach to patients with hip fracture and concurrent stroke

Abstract: We report a case of a 70-year-old man who presented with concomitant hip fracture and stroke. Our patient underwent surgical correction of a hip fracture despite the increased perioperative and postoperative risks associated with an acute stroke. He achieved good functional outcome after surgery and subsequent rehabilitation. There are no clear guidelines on the factors to determine whether a patient with concomitant stroke and hip fracture is a good candidate for surgical hip repair. Furthermore, there is als… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A case of intertrochanteric fracture and acute stroke, focusing on individual factors to reduce postoperative complications and recurrent stroke rate by a multidisciplinary team, treated with PFNA has been reported. [16] In our case, the 30-day intertrochanteric fracture had local callus growth at the fracture end on images, which may due to brain injury. [17] Meanwhile, acute post-stroke hemiplegia, pressure sores, and drug eruption of the hip make treatment more difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A case of intertrochanteric fracture and acute stroke, focusing on individual factors to reduce postoperative complications and recurrent stroke rate by a multidisciplinary team, treated with PFNA has been reported. [16] In our case, the 30-day intertrochanteric fracture had local callus growth at the fracture end on images, which may due to brain injury. [17] Meanwhile, acute post-stroke hemiplegia, pressure sores, and drug eruption of the hip make treatment more difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%