2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches and materials for endocytosis-independent intracellular delivery of proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 214 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the literature, the endocytosis mechanisms can be classified as phagocytosis, pinocytosis, and receptor‐mediated endocytosis. [ 24 ] The internalization of nanoparticles mainly depends on receptor‐mediated endocytosis, which includes clathrin/caveolae‐mediated endocytosis, and clathrin/caveolae‐independent endocytosis. [ 25 ] The endocytosis mechanism of OGP‐tFNAs was explored accordingly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature, the endocytosis mechanisms can be classified as phagocytosis, pinocytosis, and receptor‐mediated endocytosis. [ 24 ] The internalization of nanoparticles mainly depends on receptor‐mediated endocytosis, which includes clathrin/caveolae‐mediated endocytosis, and clathrin/caveolae‐independent endocytosis. [ 25 ] The endocytosis mechanism of OGP‐tFNAs was explored accordingly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ideal intracellular delivery system should include the following features: (1) efficient delivery and successful release of the cargo inside the cell; (2) minimal or no influence on the cargo activities; (3) minimal cell perturbation; (4) potential for cell-selective and/or subcellular-targeted delivery (i.e., to the cytosol, nucleus, or other specific organelles). A plethora of approaches are now being explored to facilitate the cellular uptake of proteins, including physical methods (Figure b, c), direct protein modifications (Figure d), and carrier-mediated delivery systems (Figure e). ,, …”
Section: How Can We Deliver Antibodies Into Cells?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…612 Some controversial studies have even revealed that CPPs crossed the membrane via both endocytotic and nonendocytotic pathways depending on various factors such as CPP-cargo combination, the concentration and molecular weight of the cargo, and others. 576,613 At present, cationic, amphiphilic, and hydrophobic CPPs have been developed for intracellular delivery. A growing number of peptides, when used alone or in conjugation with other CPPs, also showed good promise in organelle-targeted delivery of biologics.…”
Section: Cell-penetrating Peptides (Cpps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It stands for 1 ) the emergence of cell‐penetrating activity in a substrate appended with a dynamic covalent cascade exchanger (CAX), and 2 ) the inhibition of this cell penetration with thiol‐reactive agents, often also by the same CAX. Since the introduction of cell‐penetrating poly(disulfide)s to thiol‐mediated uptake in 2014, [2] various CAXs have been explored to deliver a wide variety of substrates to the cytosol, [3–17] including challenging objects like quantum dots, [17] genes [7–11] or proteins, [6,16] from antibodies [6] to genome editing machinery, also in vivo [7] . Although weak and unreliable, [18] the uptake inhibition with Ellman ’s reagent has traditionally been accepted as experimental evidence for the occurrence of thiol‐mediated uptake [19–21] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%