2018
DOI: 10.1107/s2059798318006496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to altering particle distributions in cryo-electron microscopy sample preparation

Abstract: This paper describes different approaches that cryo-EM users can take to improve the quality of their sample distribution and ice for high-resolution single-particle cryo-EM.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
121
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To facilitate direct comparison, we collected tomograms from regions of matching ice thickness on grids prepared using a Vitrobot. Consistent with previous reports [36][37][38] we observed a pronounced bi-phasic distribution of sample due to clustering at the air-water interfaces when prepared on a Vitrobot (Figure 4D) among multiple areas of independently produced grids (Figure 4E). Importantly, following the same analysis and quantifications of sample grids prepared by trEM we observed a significantly more uniform distribution of protein along the z-direction (Figure 4F, G), indicating an important improvement to sample quality.…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of Cryo-em Sample Prepared By Blot-free Ssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To facilitate direct comparison, we collected tomograms from regions of matching ice thickness on grids prepared using a Vitrobot. Consistent with previous reports [36][37][38] we observed a pronounced bi-phasic distribution of sample due to clustering at the air-water interfaces when prepared on a Vitrobot (Figure 4D) among multiple areas of independently produced grids (Figure 4E). Importantly, following the same analysis and quantifications of sample grids prepared by trEM we observed a significantly more uniform distribution of protein along the z-direction (Figure 4F, G), indicating an important improvement to sample quality.…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of Cryo-em Sample Prepared By Blot-free Ssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This can lead to protein denaturation but also, in almost all instances, particles are adsorbed to such interfaces and present preferential orientation due to their surface properties 17 . While supplementation of buffers with surfactants such as detergents is often employed to improve particle distribution in ice 18 , for sensitive specimens including membrane proteins this approach should be avoided. To limit the impact of preferential particle orientation, specimens can be tilted inside the microscope during data collection 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). For cryo-EM, an aqueous sample is placed on a carbon-coated copper grid which is plunged in liquid ethane that vitrifies the water into a glass-like state to enable the sample to be seen [43,44]. Ice thickness can vary depending on the dimensions of the particle but usually range from a few nanometres to a hundred nanometres [44].…”
Section: Preprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thicker the ice (>100 nm), the worse the resolution [45]. On the other hand, if the ice is too thin then either the sample is pushed towards the edge of the grid holes, or the sample can have a high affinity for the carbon support leaving the grid hole empty of sample and causing particle aggregation [43].…”
Section: Preprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%