Appropriability Strategies and Patenting motivations

Hsu, Mu‐Yen; Chuang, Hao-Jun

doi:10.5465/ambpp.2014.15239abstract

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The terminology varies, often without explanation or due consideration being given to the effect, and sometimes the same terms are used to describe different phenomena. Examples include "appropriability regime" (Lamin and Ramos, 2016;Teece, 1986), "means of appropriation" (Levin et al, 1987), "appropriability mechanisms" (Cohen et al, 2000;Hall and Sena, 2017), "modes of appropriability/appropriation" (Thomä and Bizer, 2013), "appropriation advantage" (Di Minin and Faems, 2013), "appropriation strategy" (Alexy and Reitzig, 2013;Leiponen and Byma, 2009), and "appropriability strategy" (Hsu and Chuang, 2014;Laursen and Salter, 2014;Winter, 2006). The fragmentation raises the question of whether findings have been consolidated.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distinguishing between appropriability and appropriation: A systematic review and a renewed conceptual framing

Hurmelinna‐Laukkanen

Yang

2022

Research Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study systematically reviews 200 articles published over the past three decades to reveal how appropriability and appropriation have been explained and how those perspectives resonate with developments in the innovation environment. Our results show that despite the extensive stream of literature, little effort has been made to systematically advance theory on appropriability and appropriation. Based on and extending prior literature, we propose a conceptual framing that distinguishes appropriability and appropriation, and that explains how innovating organizations build their readiness to benefit from innovation and how they realize that potential. We outline appropriability as the potential to benefit from an innovation, which accrues through instruments of appropriability: isolating appropriability mechanisms and complementary assets; and appropriation as the realization of that potential, which manifests in private and social benefits when the instruments are employed in processes for exclusion, leverage, or disclosure. We highlight the strategic importance of aligning these elements and appropriability conditions in realizing appropriation outcomes. The paper closes with a discussion on the framework's applications and relevant future research avenues.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distinguishing between appropriability and appropriation: A systematic review and a renewed conceptual framing

Hurmelinna‐Laukkanen

Yang

2022

Research Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Using One-Stop E-Commerce Platforms for Baby Product Purchases: Insights on Generation Y in Malaysia

Ann¹,

Noor²

2022

JCCC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study focuses on technological and selected psychological factors predicting the use of one-stop e-commerce platforms among Generation Y parents in Malaysia to purchase baby products. These platforms offer great convenience for parents as they can purchase almost anything at any time on one platform. Nevertheless, purchasing baby products is different because parents often prefer to physically inspect baby products and directly interact with the sales representatives for clarifications and assurance. Hence, the decision to use the one-stop e-commerce platforms rely on the parents’ confidence of the platforms. Generation Ys, now entering parenthood, has been found to be the largest contributor to the revenue of e-commerce platforms. Therefore, factors predicting their acceptance of the one-stop e-commerce platforms for baby product purchases is important for the platforms. The Technology Acceptance Model was employed in the study, incorporating the two main technology-related factors – perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use – as well as three psychological factors namely trust, perceived risk and perceived benefits in predicting the Gen Ys’ adoption of e-commerce platforms for baby product purchases. Self-administered questionnaire was employed resulting in 200 usable responses from Gen Ys, aged between 26-40. The results indicate that all factors significantly explained Gen Y’s decision to use one-stop e-commerce platforms. The perceived usefulness of the one-stop e-commerce platform technology emerged as the most predictive factor and thus should be emphasised by operators in fine-tuning their platform. Perceived risk negatively predicts purchases as hypothesized, with concerns about the inability to inspect products emerging as the key issue.

show abstract

Appropriability Strategies and Patenting motivations

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Distinguishing between appropriability and appropriation: A systematic review and a renewed conceptual framing

Distinguishing between appropriability and appropriation: A systematic review and a renewed conceptual framing

Using One-Stop E-Commerce Platforms for Baby Product Purchases: Insights on Generation Y in Malaysia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About