Welcome to the second part of our themed issue dealing with the theme of changing climate. We are reminded of the fragility of our man-made systems even to current environmental pressures by the transport chaos created from the eruption of the Eyjafjallajö kull volcano in Iceland. I wrote this editorial while stranded in San Francisco, unable to return to the UK as all flights had been cancelled. I was also away from the canvassing and political turmoil in the UK in the run-up to the May 2010 general election. I was fortunate compared with many others stranded as I was in a pleasant place and had hotel access. The disruption to flights showed how dependent we in Europe have become on this form of transport for goods and personal travel. This was an acute shock to our systems rather than the chronic effects we expect from climate change, yet in the history of the planet both types of impact are over very short timescales.The vulnerability of our core infrastructure systems to both types of shock is apparent and are a result of design and planning systems that are based on 'optimisation' of their performance -leaving little headroom when perturbations occur. Recent concepts such as 'just-in-time' provision leave no space for coping with uncertainty and need to be re-appraised in light of this (Hallegate, 2009). Concepts such as flexibility, reversibility and adaptability need to be reconsidered in the design and operation of our infrastructure systems. In the USA not only was there no interest in the UK's general election, but scant information about the flight chaos in Europe. This should be contrasted with the UK media's over-interest in all things American. It is not surprising therefore that many in the USA have no awareness of or belief in climate change. I was informed by someone on the boat back from Alcatraz that climate change was actually a conspiracy of the American Government used only as a reason to curtail the individual freedom of citizens.This issue of Engineering Sustainability has four papers and four briefings, as well as a historical paper featuring a re-publication of Schumacher's seminal work Small is beautiful (Jeffrey, 2010). Whilst in the USA I attended the ASCE low impact development (LID) conference, dealing primarily with stormwater systems. Unlike the UK, and in common with Australia and New Zealand, American practice adopts a 'can-do' approach. There are known problems with non-piped drainage systems and the Americans have moved on from the best management practice (BMP) approach of the past, where ponds were seen as acceptable at the ends of pipes, in the way that many SUDS systems are applied in the UK, to LIDs: a holistic catchment and urban planning approach involving partnerships in municipality-led development and retrofits. Much of this is now being badged as green infrastructure (GI). Significant efforts are now being made to evaluate in financial terms the added-value of LID or GI as an alternative or complement to traditional piped system drainage (Wise et al., 2010) also id...