2010 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ecce.2010.5617925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriate tuning and robust design of a generalized predictive speed controller for drive systems with resonant loads

Abstract: This paper presents an analysis of the appropriate tuning and robust control design for a model based predictive speed controller -the Generalized Predictive Controller (GPC) -used in a drive system with a resonant load. The resonance results from a finite stiffness of a long drive shaft. The achievable control quality of a model based predictive controller dependents on the appropriate choice of the control design parameters and the accuracy of the applied system model. If the predictive controller is not tun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the specific knowledge one might have, it might be easier for some users to implement an SS controller and for other users to implement a predictive controller. However, the complexity of the implementation and tuning of the PI-SS SC and the GPC SC is much higher than that of a conventional PI SC , as shown in Sections III-A-C. Further information about the design of PI-SS SC and GPC SC can be found in [20], [53], and [54].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Speed Control Methods Concerning Theorementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depending on the specific knowledge one might have, it might be easier for some users to implement an SS controller and for other users to implement a predictive controller. However, the complexity of the implementation and tuning of the PI-SS SC and the GPC SC is much higher than that of a conventional PI SC , as shown in Sections III-A-C. Further information about the design of PI-SS SC and GPC SC can be found in [20], [53], and [54].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Speed Control Methods Concerning Theorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To summarize the MBPC SC control design and to ensure a suitable bandwidth for the proposed comparative study, the GPC design parameters are chosen as in Further information and additional analysis on the proposed MBPC SC is presented in [53] and [54].…”
Section: Generalized Predictive Speed Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the specific knowledge one might have, it might be easier for some users to implement a state space controller and for other users to implement a predictive controller. However, the complexity of implementation and tuning of the PI-SS SC and the GPC SC is much higher than that of a conventional PI SC , as shown in section III, A, B, and C. Further information about the design of PI-SS SC and GPC SC can be found in [15], [34], and [35].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Speed Control Methods Concerning Theorementioning
confidence: 99%