Three different control methods for the speed control of drive systems with elastically coupled loads are presented and compared. In drive applications where the load is connected to the driving motor with a drive shaft that has a finite stiffness, unwanted mechanical dynamics can occur. These unwanted dynamics can stress both the mechanical and electrical drive components. Furthermore, the shaft torsion, if neglected in the control synthesis, can dramatically reduce the achievable control performance. To overcome these challenges, the design, analysis, and comparative study of three speed control methods for a drive system with resonant loads are carried out. The considered control methods are the following: a conventional proportional-integral (PI) control, a PI-based state space control, and a model-based predictive control. To ensure a suitable basis for their comparison, the three different speed control methods are designed with equal bandwidths and are verified with the same test setup. Furthermore, all speed control methods presented use only the drive-side speed measurement to control the drive speed.Index Terms-AC machine, adjustable speed drive, asynchronous motor, control of drive, predictive control, state feedback, test bench, vibrations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.