2014
DOI: 10.12988/ams.2014.49754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate analytical solutions of strongly nonlinear fractional BBM-Burger’s equations with dissipative term

Abstract: In this article, we study and implement a relatively new analytical technique called q-Homotopy Analysis Method on the strongly nonlinear fractional BBM-Burger's equations with dissipative term. We obtain analytically, approximate solutions with two different initial conditions in the form of convergent series with easily computable components. For some special cases on the coefficient of the dissipative term, comparison is made with the exact solution and the solution obtained using other existing analytical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also the power series solution in subfigure (F) and Equation (10) when n → ∞ converge to the exact solution. In Table 4, we find that the numerical results resulting from the presented method were compared with the numerical results from homotopy analysis method (HAM), 41 q-homotopy analysis method (q-HAM), 42 modified residual power series method (RPSM), 19 variational iteration method (VIM) 40 and homotopy perturbation method (HPM), 40 which show the superiority of the proposed method over other methods in obtaining a lower error rate and thus a better approximation to the exact solution. Table 2 shows a comparison of the convergence analysis resulting from the proposed method with HAM, q-HAM, modified RPSM, VIM, and HPM, which shows the advantage of the proposed method.…”
Section: Applications With Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the power series solution in subfigure (F) and Equation (10) when n → ∞ converge to the exact solution. In Table 4, we find that the numerical results resulting from the presented method were compared with the numerical results from homotopy analysis method (HAM), 41 q-homotopy analysis method (q-HAM), 42 modified residual power series method (RPSM), 19 variational iteration method (VIM) 40 and homotopy perturbation method (HPM), 40 which show the superiority of the proposed method over other methods in obtaining a lower error rate and thus a better approximation to the exact solution. Table 2 shows a comparison of the convergence analysis resulting from the proposed method with HAM, q-HAM, modified RPSM, VIM, and HPM, which shows the advantage of the proposed method.…”
Section: Applications With Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is shown in Table 3, we present the absolute error in (48) between different values of x and t when α � 1, 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, − 2 ≤ x ≤ 2. And the least-squares residual power series method (LSRPSM) and the q-homotopy analysis method (q-HAM) [32] with u i (x, t) when i � 2 are compared with the classic residual power series method with u i (x, t) when i � 2, as shown in Table 3. e approximate solutions of the q-HAM can be written as 8 Complexity…”
Section: Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search for a better way to expand the convergence region led to the modification of HAM, called q-HAM, more of a general method than HAM [48]. Many authors have taken advantage of q-HAM and used it to solve nonlinear fractional partial differential equations [49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. The q-HATM was proposed by Singh et al [56] and did not require any form of discretization, linearization, or perturbation as compared to other methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%