2017
DOI: 10.1214/17-ba1080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate Bayesian Inference in Semiparametric Copula Models

Abstract: We describe a simple method for making inference on a functional of a multivariate distribution, based on its copula representation. We make use of an approximate Bayesian Monte Carlo algorithm, where the proposed values of the functional of interest are weighted in terms of their Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood. This method is particularly useful when the “true” likelihood function associated with the working model is too costly to evaluate or when the working model is only partially specif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to Gaussian Bayesian variable selection, where in some examples fixed (such as = 100 or = ) can provide good results (Smith and Kohn, 1996). Moreover, in the second example we also find that integrating out uncertainty in as in Grazian and Liseo (2017) does not meaningfully effect covariate selection or prediction. The method is scalable to higher dimensions because estimation by stochastic search over is fast when exploiting the matrix identities in the Web Appendix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in contrast to Gaussian Bayesian variable selection, where in some examples fixed (such as = 100 or = ) can provide good results (Smith and Kohn, 1996). Moreover, in the second example we also find that integrating out uncertainty in as in Grazian and Liseo (2017) does not meaningfully effect covariate selection or prediction. The method is scalable to higher dimensions because estimation by stochastic search over is fast when exploiting the matrix identities in the Web Appendix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…It is common to use twostage estimators, where is estimated first, followed by , because they are much faster and often involve only a minor loss of efficiency (Joe, 2005). Grazian and Liseo (2017) and Klein and Smith (2019) integrate out uncertainty for using a Bayesian nonparametric estimator, but find that this does not improve the accuracy of inference meaningfully, as we also demonstrate in an empirical example in Part F of the Web Appendix. Therefore, we adopt a two-stage estimator, and use the adaptive kernel density estimator (KDE) of Shimazaki and Shinomoto (2010) to estimate .…”
Section: Estimation and Inferencementioning
confidence: 82%
“…In a second approach, we follow Grazian and Liseo (2017) and integrate out the posterior uncertainty for F Y when estimating the copula parameters using an MCMC scheme. To do so, at each sweep of the MCMC scheme, we re-compute the pseudo data…”
Section: Posterior Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalla Valle et al [2018] extended the approach of Wu et al [2015] to bivariate conditional copulas, introducing dependence from covariates and implementing Bayesian nonparametric inference via an infinite mixture model. A different approach is followed by Grazian and Liseo [2017], who described an approximate Bayesian inference method for semiparametric bivariate copulas, based on the empirical likelihood. This approach is extended by Grazian et al [2021], who compared several Bayesian methods to approximate the posterior distribution of functionals of the dependence including covariates, using nonparametric models which avoid the selection of the copula function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%