2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/4367205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate Conformal Mappings and Elasticity Theory

Abstract: Here, we present the new method of approximate conformal mapping of the unit disk to a one-connected domain with smooth boundary without auxiliary constructions and iterations. The mapping function is a Taylor polynomial. The method is applicable to elasticity problems solution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After separating the imaginary part of Equation 3.1 we obtain the following Fredholm integral equation: g 0 ( t ) = 1 normalπ 0 2 π f 0 false( normalτ false) ( log [ z false( normalτ false) z false( t false) ] ) τ d normalτ + 1 normalπ 0 2 π g 0 false( normalτ false) ( arg [ z false( normalτ false) z false( t false) ] ) τ d normalτ . We consider the factor ( e i τ e i t ) in the expression ( z ( τ ) z ( t ) ) in order to separate the improper PV integral in the Fredholm equation of the second kind as follows : left z ( τ ) z ( t ) = k = m m c k true( e i k τ e i k t true) = true( e i τ e i t true) true[ k = 1 m c k e i k t …”
Section: Cauchy Integral Methods For the Solution Of The Dirichlet Promentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After separating the imaginary part of Equation 3.1 we obtain the following Fredholm integral equation: g 0 ( t ) = 1 normalπ 0 2 π f 0 false( normalτ false) ( log [ z false( normalτ false) z false( t false) ] ) τ d normalτ + 1 normalπ 0 2 π g 0 false( normalτ false) ( arg [ z false( normalτ false) z false( t false) ] ) τ d normalτ . We consider the factor ( e i τ e i t ) in the expression ( z ( τ ) z ( t ) ) in order to separate the improper PV integral in the Fredholm equation of the second kind as follows : left z ( τ ) z ( t ) = k = m m c k true( e i k τ e i k t true) = true( e i τ e i t true) true[ k = 1 m c k e i k t …”
Section: Cauchy Integral Methods For the Solution Of The Dirichlet Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solvability of Equation 3.5 was proved in with the help of the following Lemma which can be formulated in the following form:Lemma Let Y ( t ) be 2 π periodic with the bounded second derivative (i.e ., | Y ( t ) | < T ) and let G ( τ , t ) be 2 π periodic with respect to both variables. Assume that there exist numbers j , p > 1 and a constant U > 0 such that false| j + p G ( τ , t ) t j normalτ p false| U . Then, the approximate solution of the uniquely resolvable Fredholm integral equation of the second kind X ( t ) = 0 2 π G false( normalτ , t false) X false( normalτ false) d normalτ + Y false( t false) , can be reduced to solution of finite linear system with error estimated by O true( 1 / N 2 true) where N is the finite linear system rank .…”
Section: Cauchy Integral Methods For the Solution Of The Dirichlet Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the factor ( − ) in the expression ( ( ) − ( )), = 0, 1 in order to separate the improper PV integral in the Fredholm equation of the second kind as follows [8,9]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solvability of (11) is proved in [8] where the Fourier series solution form of the functions s ( ), s = 0, 1, leads us to an infinite linear system of equations which can be reduced to a finite one according to the following lemma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation