2006
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.23.001608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate model for surface-plasmon generation at slit apertures

Abstract: We present a semianalytical model that quantitatively predicts the scattering of light by a single subwavelength slit in a thick metal screen. In contrast to previous theoretical works related to the transmission properties of the slit, the analysis emphasizes the generation of surface plasmons at the slit apertures. The model relies on a two-stage scattering mechanism, a purely geometric diffraction problem in the immediate vicinity of the slit aperture followed by the launching of a bounded surface-plasmon w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
128
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
10
128
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The SPP intensity and amplitude are obtained by using the mode orthogonality condition. [32] To begin with, the symmetric slit (d = 0) is considered. The intensities of the right-and left-propagating SPPs generated by the symmetric slit of different slit widths are depicted in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Numerical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SPP intensity and amplitude are obtained by using the mode orthogonality condition. [32] To begin with, the symmetric slit (d = 0) is considered. The intensities of the right-and left-propagating SPPs generated by the symmetric slit of different slit widths are depicted in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Numerical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Equation (4), the SPP intensity becomes a minimum when the slit width equals even multiple of the half wavelength while the SPP intensity reaches a maximum when the slit width equals odd multiple of the half wavelength, according well with the previous results. [31,32] The reason is that the charges at the corners of the symmetric slit exhibit opposite signs, as shown by the inset in Figure 1(b). This mechanism also explains the synchronous oscillation curves in the case of d = λ/2 [ Figure 1(e)].…”
Section: Numerical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the TM mode propagates through the slit, it couples to surface plasmon modes on the front and back surfaces of the slit [14], which act as a loss channel. Since these losses are larger for certain slit widths [15][16][17], the transmitted intensity of the TM mode is more dependent on the slit width than the perfectly conducting waveguide model predicts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(20) of Ref. [15], which gives an approximate analytical model. As an illustration of the important role these surface plasmon coupling constants play in the phenomenon described here, the TM transmission modelled with and without coupling to surface plasmons is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Waveguide Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Kim et al designed an unidirectional SPP launcher consisting of a single slit with its width comparable to or larger than the incident wavelength [15] . However, such a wide slit has a low SPP excitation efficiency because most of the light illuminating the slit would be directly transmitted through the slit rather than coupling into SPPs [17] . Recently, we demonstrated efficient directional excitation of SPPs on a metal film through a subwavelength double nanoslit [16] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%