2014
DOI: 10.1080/02331934.2014.979818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate proper efficiency in vector optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where ε > 0 and E is an improvement set with respect to C; (vi) intE, where E is a solid (i.e., intE = ∅) improvement set with respect to C. For more details and examples of improvement sets, one can refer to [23,14,39,40,41,33,28]. 3.…”
Section: Definition 22 [23 14]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where ε > 0 and E is an improvement set with respect to C; (vi) intE, where E is a solid (i.e., intE = ∅) improvement set with respect to C. For more details and examples of improvement sets, one can refer to [23,14,39,40,41,33,28]. 3.…”
Section: Definition 22 [23 14]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gutiérrez et al [23] generalized the concepts of improvement set and E-optimality to a general topological vector space. Subsequent works about this aspect one can also refer to Zhao and Yang [39,40], Zhao et al [41], Oppezzi and Rossi [33], Lalitha and Chatterjee [28]. As mentioned in [23], E-optimality via improvement sets has been shown to be very suitable to deal in a unified way with well-known exact and approximate nondominated concepts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We denoted this by Ge( f, S, R p + , ). Definition 3.6 [20]. Let Z be a normed linear space and ∈ K. A feasible pointx ∈ S is called an −Super proper efficient solution of (MOP) if there exist λ ∈ (0, 1) and M > 0 such that…”
Section: Cone Characterizations Of Approximate Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scalarization for cone-ordered optimization, including the Pareto case, has been studied extensively. For example, see [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], which present scalarizations of varying degrees of abstraction. Few involve polyhedral cones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%