1998
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75829-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate Reliability of Genetic Evaluations Under an Animal Model

Abstract: A method was developed for calculating approximate reliability for national systems of evaluation. The method combined the reliability of three information sources: parent average, animal's own records, and progeny records. This method provided good approximation to the actual values with minimal upward bias and was considerably better than the current national method of New Zealand genetic evaluation or Meyer's method for all accuracy measures. Our method had an average absolute bias of 0.006 compared with 0.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are at least two reasons that can cause non-accumulative gains in reliability. One is that the information sources (cow information and US bull information here) are not independent (Harris and Johnson, 1998), and the other is that the increase of reliability with increase of reference population size is not linear (Daetwyler et al, 2008;Goddard, 2009;Goddard and Hayes, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are at least two reasons that can cause non-accumulative gains in reliability. One is that the information sources (cow information and US bull information here) are not independent (Harris and Johnson, 1998), and the other is that the increase of reliability with increase of reference population size is not linear (Daetwyler et al, 2008;Goddard, 2009;Goddard and Hayes, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EBV combining different sources of information were standardized to a mean of 0 and a genetic standard deviation corresponding to the square root of the estimated breed genetic variance. For each animal, the reliability of the combined EBV was computed using the Harris and Johnson (1998) approach. This reliability was compared with the one obtained when only CM information is included or when correlated traits are added one at a time.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parental contribution to the reliability of each PTA was removed using the method described by Harris and Johnson (1998)…”
Section: Phenotypic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%