Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 2012
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611973099.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation algorithms for two-state anti-ferromagnetic spin systems on bounded degree graphs

Abstract: In a seminal paper [10], Weitz gave a deterministic fully polynomial approximation scheme for counting exponentially weighted independent sets (which is the same as approximating the partition function of the hard-core model from statistical physics) in graphs of degree at most d, up to the critical activity for the uniqueness of the Gibbs measure on the infinite d-regular tree. More recently Sly [8] (see also [1]) showed that this is optimal in the sense that if there is an FPRAS for the hard-core partition f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
120
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above result indicates that almost all imaginary Ising partition functions are substantially hard to calculate even in the approximated case with a multiplicative error. This result contrasts with the existence of a FPRAS in the ferromagnetic cases with magnetic fields shown by Jerrum and Sinclair [33] and antiferromagnetic cases on a sort of lattices shown by Sinclair, Srivastava, and Thurley [88]. In these cases, an exact calculation is #P-hard but its approximation with a multiplicative error is easy.…”
Section: Hardness Of Approximating Ising Partition Functionsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The above result indicates that almost all imaginary Ising partition functions are substantially hard to calculate even in the approximated case with a multiplicative error. This result contrasts with the existence of a FPRAS in the ferromagnetic cases with magnetic fields shown by Jerrum and Sinclair [33] and antiferromagnetic cases on a sort of lattices shown by Sinclair, Srivastava, and Thurley [88]. In these cases, an exact calculation is #P-hard but its approximation with a multiplicative error is easy.…”
Section: Hardness Of Approximating Ising Partition Functionsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Our general setup is two-spin systems on an input graph G = (V , E) with maximum degree Δ. We follow the setup of several related previous works [12,26,18]. Configurations of the system are assignments σ : V → {−1, +1}.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the hard-core model, Kelly [17] showed that non-uniqueness holds if and only if λ > λ c ( (see e.g. [26]). For general antiferromagnetic two-spin models with soft constraints (i.e., B 1 B 2 > 0), non-uniqueness holds if and only if √ B 1 B 2 < (Δ − 2)/Δ and λ ∈ (λ 1 , λ 2 ) for some critical values λ 1 (Δ, B 1 , B 2 ), λ 2 (Δ, B 1 , B 2 ) (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this algorithm, as well as the follow-up algorithms (e.g. [19,21,22]) require particularly strong spatial mixing conditions, that is, they require what we call the strong spatial mixing condition. On the other hand, the weaker, in terms of approximation guarantees, algorithms in [3,17] require a condition called weak spatial mixing and locally tree-like structure 1 for the underlying graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%