2014
DOI: 10.1002/pamm.201410124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation of the dual problem for error estimation in inelastic problems

Abstract: In numerical simulations with the finite element method the dependency on the mesh -and for time-dependent problems on the time discretization -arises. Adaptive refinements in space (and time) based on goal-oriented error estimation [1] become more and more popular for finite element analyses to balance computational effort and accuracy of the solution. The introduction of a goal quantity of interest defines a dual problem which has to be solved to estimate the error with respect to it. Often such procedures a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For some restrictions, we show that it is possible to obtain equivalent formulations. As a consequence, we call our proposed method an approximation of the exact problem with the space‐time Galerkin method, and the results are promising, see also our previous work for preliminary results. The main innovations of this paper can be summarized as follows: Goal‐oriented error estimation that drives adaptive refinement in space and time for inelastic problems in solid mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…For some restrictions, we show that it is possible to obtain equivalent formulations. As a consequence, we call our proposed method an approximation of the exact problem with the space‐time Galerkin method, and the results are promising, see also our previous work for preliminary results. The main innovations of this paper can be summarized as follows: Goal‐oriented error estimation that drives adaptive refinement in space and time for inelastic problems in solid mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%