1986
DOI: 10.3133/ofr86534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aquifer-nomenclature guidelines

Abstract: If aquifers are named, the names should be derived from lithologic terms, rock-stratigraphic units, or geographic names. The following items are not recommended as sources of aquifer names: time-stratigraphic names, relative position, alphanumeric designations, depositional environment, depth of occurence, acronyms, and hydro!ogic conditions. Confining units should not be named unless doing so clearly promotes understanding of a particular aquifer system. Sources of names for confining units are similar to tho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The draft classification scheme (Table 5-1) developed by the subcommittee follows guidelines published by Laney and Davidson (1986) for naming hydrogeologic units in USGS reports. The hydrostratigraphic classification uses a hierarchy of aquifer and confining units ranked at four levels.…”
Section: Hydrostratigraphic Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The draft classification scheme (Table 5-1) developed by the subcommittee follows guidelines published by Laney and Davidson (1986) for naming hydrogeologic units in USGS reports. The hydrostratigraphic classification uses a hierarchy of aquifer and confining units ranked at four levels.…”
Section: Hydrostratigraphic Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). The system is divided into two aquifers, in ascending order Aquifer Units IIA and IIB (Figs.6,8,9,10,11,12), separated by Confining Unit IIA-iiB.…”
Section: Regional Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tile method of naming hydrostratigraphic units at SRS is modified from that developed by Laney and Davidson, 1986, is similar to the method proposed by Seaber, 1986, and follows the draft proposal for nomenclature recommended by the South Carolina Hydrostratigraphic Subcommittec. The system includes both formal and informal units and is based on a hierarchy of stratigraphic units ranked at three levels.…”
Section: Appendix a Definition Of Hydrostratigraphic Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different from other types of geological units (lithostratigraphic, biostratigraphic and chronostratigraphic), for which univocal criteria of nomenclature and formal classifications have been issued (ISSC, 1976), there is still a lack for of hydrostratigraphic units. Therefore, the definition of aquifer (Meinzer, 1923) and the US Geological Survey's (USGS) multi-rank nomenclature (Jorgensen & Rosenshein, 1987;Laney & Davidson, 1986;Owen, 1987), of aquifer system, aquifer and zone, were considered as fundamental references. Accordingly, the hydrogeological complex concept (Civita, 1975), defined as a set of lithotypes with a prevailing type of permeability, a permeability grade ranging in a limited interval and a proved spatial and structural unity, was considered applicable in this work.…”
Section: Database and Methods For Regional Hydrogeological Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%