Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Community Sample of United Arab Emirates Nationals

Coelho, Olga; Pires, Rute; Ferreira, Ana Sousa; Gonçalves, Bruno; AlJassmi, Maryam; Stocker, Joana

doi:10.2174/1745017902016010180

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, this deviation remains conceptually coherent because Impulsivity is also a well-established feature of Neuroticism within the five-factor model of personality ( 36 ); it is also empirically well-established that Disinhibition and Antagonism overlap within one joint externalizing factor ( 37 ). The primary loading of Impulsivity on the Negative Affectivity domain is also consistent with previous research using Iranian ( 24 ) and Spanish-speaking ( 38 ) samples, suggesting that this pattern may be more pronounced in certain cultures. From a conceptual and clinical perspective, it also makes sense that Negative Affectivity (e.g., emotional dysregulation) co-occurs with features of Impulsivity ( 39 , 40 ).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ICD-11 Classification of Personality Disorders and the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) operate with trait domains that contribute to the individual expression of personality disturbance (i.e., negative affectivity, detachment, dissociality, disinhibition, anankastia, and psychoticism). To date, these trait frameworks have not been investigated sufficiently in Middle Eastern cultures. Thus, the present study explored the structure of the ICD-11 and AMPD personality disorder (PD) trait domains in a large mixed sample from the Kurdistan zone of Iran. The ICD-11 and AMPD trait domains were operationalized using empirically supported algorithms for the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). The PID-5 was administered to a large mixed sample (N = 3,196) composed of 2,678 community and 518 clinical participants. Structural validity was investigated using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), whereas differential construct validity was explored by comparing clinical and community scores. Model fit and the expected factor structure were deemed appropriate for the ICD-11 trait model, but less adequate for the DSM-5 trait model (i.e., disinhibition did not emerge as a separate factor). All domain and facet scores showed significant differences between clinical and community subsamples with moderate to large effects, mostly for disinhibition and dissociality/antagonism while least for anankastia. The findings of the present study may suggest that the ICD-11 trait model is more cross-culturally fitting than the DSM-5 AMPD trait model, at least with respect to a large mixed sample from the region of Kurdistan. Accordingly, there is evidence for using PID-5 data for WHO ICD-11 purposes in this part of the World.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…The same applies to a study solely based on university students from Algeria (22). Beyond the aforementioned studies, only the AMPD trait model has been investigated in Middle Eastern cultures with some empirical support (23)(24)(25).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The community sample was selected from a large convenience sample of Emirati citizens (N = 1090) recruited from Zayed University Dubai and Abu Dhabi students and their acquaintances. 34 Only the participants that declared had no mental disorders were included in the community sample.…”

Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…32 Despite its worldwide popularity, extensive empirical research, and promising results, to date only 3 studies have been published with the PID-5 in Arabic countries. After the translation of the PID-5 into Arabic that was conducted in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Qatar, 33 a second study was conducted within the United Arab Emirates national population using the Arabic PID-5, 34 and a third study using the Arabic short version of the PID-5, 35 in Algeria. All these studies were conducted in community samples and, to the best of our knowledge, there are no data on clinical Arabic speaking populations.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Clinical Sample of United Arab Emirates (UAE) Nationals

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: We aimed to test the potential of the Arabic version of the PID-5 to distinguish between clinical and non-clinical participants, as well as to examine its convergent validity and factor structure in an Emirati clinical sample. Methods: The Arabic version of the PID-5 was administered to a clinical sample comprised of 156 participants (Mage = 31.38, SD = 8.99, 37.8% male, 62.2% female) and a community sample also comprised of 156 participants (Mage = 31.43, SD = 9.52, 37.2% male, 62.8% female). We addressed the descriptive measures, internal consistency, mean rank scores differences, convergent validity with SCL-90-R, and PID-5's factor structure. Results: As expected, the clinical sample presented statistically significantly higher scores than the non-clinical sample, with medium to high effect sizes. In addition, all the PID-5 domains showed positive correlations with most of the symptomatic constellations of the SCL-90-R as well as the PID-5 facets with all their SCL-90-R counterparts. However, our findings did not entirely replicate the PID-5 original 5-factor structure, as only a 4-factor solution was retained. Conclusions: Future studies with the Arabic PID-5 in clinical samples are needed to understand its relevance and clinical utility in Arabic countries.

show abstract

“…Regarding its internal structure, studies have found it challenging to completely replicate the five-domain original model and the 25 facets proposed by Krueger et al ( 4 – 6 , 11 , 12 , 17 , 18 ). The critical points include a lack of consensus on whether the facets are one-dimension ( 19 , 20 ), interstitiality between facets [e.g., hostility - Labancz et al ( 11 )], and poor residual and comparative goodness of fit indexes ( 21 ), with facets not satisfactory loading on the domain of origin.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric study of the brazilian version of the personality inventory for DSM-5–paper-and-pencil version

Barchi-Ferreira

Osório

2022

Front. Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 - Self Reported Form (PID-5-SRF) operationalizes Criterion B of the personality alternative model of DSM-5 Section III and has already been cross-culturally adapted to many countries. The objective is to present evidence of validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of PID-5 (pencil-and-paper) in a Brazilian community sample. The sample was composed of 730 individuals from the general population [67.8% women, aged 33.84 (SD = ±15.2), 69.5% ≥ 12 years of schooling]. The participants were recruited in academic, organizational, healthcare, and business facilities in three Brazilian states. The snowball method was used. The PID-5 Brazilian version and the Revised NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI-R) were individually applied, and the retest was applied 30 days after. Satisfactory internal consistency (facets α ≥0.51; domains α ≥0.82) and test-retest reliability (facets ICC ≥ 0.45; domains ICC ≥0.76) were found, but a floor effect was verified in 97.7% of the items. Regarding convergent validity, strong correlations were found between the PID-5 and the NEO-FFI-R domains (r = −0.44 to 0.70). Ten facets did not fit the unidemensional structure. Confirmatory Factor Analyses did not present adequate goodness of fit, and Exploratory Analyses indicated that a five-factor model is more appropriate, though it presents some peculiarities concerning the original model. PID-5 also presented satisfactory goodness of fit to the personality hierarchical model. Generally, the instrument's psychometric indicators favor its use in the Brazilian context. However, some aspects demand attention, and more specific studies should be conducted to verify the impact of reverse-scored items, floor effect, and peculiarities of its internal structure (some facets' multidimensionality and interstitiality) concerning the original model.

show abstract

Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Community Sample of United Arab Emirates Nationals

Cited by 11 publications

References 58 publications

The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model

The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model

The Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Clinical Sample of United Arab Emirates (UAE) Nationals

Psychometric study of the brazilian version of the personality inventory for DSM-5–paper-and-pencil version

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About