2003
DOI: 10.2307/3217756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aramaic k, lyk and Iraqi Arabic aku, maku: The Mesopotamian Particles of Existence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was not the conclusion that Watson (2002) came to when he compared Sana'a dialect with Cairo dialect.Watson resulted that Sana'ani (ay) equals Cairene (ē) (Palatal), while (aw) equals (ō) (labio-velar) (Watson, 2002, P.22). However, other researchers preferred to describe Arabic grammar to see how and why these variations and other grammatical items of SA occur (Said, 2002;Müller-Kessler, 2003). Today, new trends in studying of dialects continue to include subjects that are discussed in light of theories (Sakarna, 2005) like Optimality Theory (OT) (Rosenthall, 2006;Bamakhramah, 2010).…”
Section: International Journal Of Linguisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was not the conclusion that Watson (2002) came to when he compared Sana'a dialect with Cairo dialect.Watson resulted that Sana'ani (ay) equals Cairene (ē) (Palatal), while (aw) equals (ō) (labio-velar) (Watson, 2002, P.22). However, other researchers preferred to describe Arabic grammar to see how and why these variations and other grammatical items of SA occur (Said, 2002;Müller-Kessler, 2003). Today, new trends in studying of dialects continue to include subjects that are discussed in light of theories (Sakarna, 2005) like Optimality Theory (OT) (Rosenthall, 2006;Bamakhramah, 2010).…”
Section: International Journal Of Linguisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association between the augments and the pronominal system is found in Medieval Arabic grammars, but has no historical basis. Additionally, these augments are most likely internal innovations, as they do not occur in the earlier phases of these languages (for Arabic, see Müller-Kessler 2003: 642). In Quranic Arabic, the augment – ka was interpreted as 2m.s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reading, see also Müller-Kessler 2003: 642. The derivation of Iraqi Arabic ʾaku from Babylonian Aramaic was first posited in Lidzbarski 1915: 130, n. 7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%