2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arbitrage and asset market equilibrium in infinite dimensional economies with short-selling and risk-averse expected utilities

Abstract: International audienceWe consider a model with an infinite number of states of nature, von Neumann–Morgenstern utilities, where agents have different probability beliefs and where short sells are allowed. We show that no-arbitrage conditions, defined for finite dimensional asset markets models, are not sufficient to ensure existence of equilibrium in presence of an infinite number of states of nature. However, if the individually rational utility set U is compact, we obtain an equilibrium. We give conditions w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposition 1 states that the set A is bounded in l 1 (π). In [15], the authors prove that A is l 1 (π) compact when b i = +∞ for any i. Hence U is compact since l ∞ (π) ⊂ l p (π) ⊂ l 1 (π).…”
Section: Comments On Our Assumptions and Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Proposition 1 states that the set A is bounded in l 1 (π). In [15], the authors prove that A is l 1 (π) compact when b i = +∞ for any i. Hence U is compact since l ∞ (π) ⊂ l p (π) ⊂ l 1 (π).…”
Section: Comments On Our Assumptions and Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assumption (NA) deserves an explanation. In [15], we have an example with two agents, where (NA0) holds and we have no equilibrium because the agents do not have No Half-Line of the same line property. In our paper we introduce condition A1 (No Half Line of the same type).…”
Section: Comments On Our Assumptions and Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Literature review Preconditions and perspectives of creation of the social market economy and the accumulated practical experience are discussed in the works of Agunovich et al (2018), Andronova andRiazantsev (2006), D'Aleo and, Goyal and Sergi (2015a), Goyal and Sergi (2015b), Goyal et al (2015), Goyal et al (2017), Haabazoka et al (2019), Ivanov et al (2019), Pichkov (2016), Popkova and French (2017), Popkova and Sergi (2020), , , Popkova et al (2018), Popkova and Zmiyak (2019), Pritvorova et al (2018), Qerimi and Sergi (2015), Ragulina (2019), Sergi et al (2019), Shevyakova and Petrenko (2018), Shevyakova et al (2019) and Zavyalova et al (2018). Risk management and related crisis management of market economy ("pure" market) are described in the works of Adetiloye et al (2017), Amin (2019), Apergis (2015), Balima et al (2017), Benda et al (2019), Bertolini and Goglio (2019), Boonman (2019), Bouri (2015), Br€ ulle et al (2019), Deb et al (2020), Demiralay (2019), Floyd (2019), Gencer and Demiralay (2016), Ha-Huy et al (2016), Jiang et al (2017), Kourachanis (2019), Laitsou et al (2017), Matsuoka (2018), Mul e (2019), Naess and B ardsen (2015), ...…”
Section: Managing Social Market Economymentioning
confidence: 99%