1993
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2589-2593.1993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction as a rapid method to differentiate crossed from independent Pseudomonas cepacia infections in cystic fibrosis patients

Abstract: We used DNA fingerprinting by the arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR) technique for an epidemiological investigation of 23 Pseudomonas cepacia isolates obtained from 11 cystic fibrosis (CF) patients attending our CF center. This approach was compared with ribotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and conventional phenotypic typing. AP-PCR and ribotyping were identical in resolving power, since the two methods generated four different profiles and identified the same group of strain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PFGE provides a sensitive alternative approach for bacterial strain differentiation, molecular epidemiology and clonal analysis. Investigations by Bingen et al (3) have indicated that PFGE offered increased discriminatory power compared with AP-PCR and ribotyping in epidemiological studies of Pseudomonas cepacia. PFGE of Sacll digests of i^.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…PFGE provides a sensitive alternative approach for bacterial strain differentiation, molecular epidemiology and clonal analysis. Investigations by Bingen et al (3) have indicated that PFGE offered increased discriminatory power compared with AP-PCR and ribotyping in epidemiological studies of Pseudomonas cepacia. PFGE of Sacll digests of i^.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR) has proven to be a valuable tool in studies of genetic polymorphisms, epidemiological investigations, clonal analysis and studies of the population genetics of a variety of organisms (3,14,17,19,20,25). AP-PCR was originally described by Welsh & McClelland (30) and Williams et al (31) as a method for analyzing genetic polymorphisms of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By summing the results of AP-PCR profiles generated with three different primers, Saulnier et al (10) were able to identify 25 AP-PCR patterns in a group of 26 strains of Staphylococcus aureus shown to be different by CHEF. Bingen et al (4) used AP-PCR to identify four different strains of Pseudomonas cepacia in a group of 23 isolates, whereas CHEF was able to discriminate five strains. Similarly, in our study, the improvement in sensitivity of CHEF over AP-PCR was a small one, identifying 49 CHEF patterns in a group of isolates having 47 AP-PCR patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERIC sequences are often used as primers, both for Gram-positive bacteria such as S. aureus (32), and for Gram-negative species such as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (33). For B. cepacia, promising results indicate equal resolution power with AP-PCR and ribotyping, and only minimally less discriminative power compared with PFGE (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%