2011
DOI: 10.1002/gj.1311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Archaean granulite facies metamorphism at the Singhbhum Craton–Eastern Ghats Mobile Belt interface: implication for the Ur supercontinent assembly

Abstract: In this study, we investigate the geological significance and the antiquity of lower crustal granulite facies metamorphism from the Rengali Domain, which lies in between the Singhbhum Craton in the north and the Eastern Ghats Mobile Belt in the south. Petrographic, mineral compositional, metamorphic reaction history and geothermobarometric studies of two representative metapelite granulite samples reveal widespread biotite melting at peak granulite facies metamorphic conditions of 7.8 ± 0.13 kbar, 849 ± 31°C a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(185 reference statements)
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Timing of this thrusting event is yet to be known, but recent geochronological data show that the syn-kinematic granite emplacement within this Rengali granulite occurred at ca. 2.80 Ga which closely matches with the dominant monazite Th-U-Pb age from the pelitic granulite (Mahapatro et al, 2012;Bose et al, 2013). The timing of the M 1 event is still uncertain, but it must be older than 2.80 Ga based on available textural and field relation criteria and limited geochronological data .…”
Section: Rng 62bsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Timing of this thrusting event is yet to be known, but recent geochronological data show that the syn-kinematic granite emplacement within this Rengali granulite occurred at ca. 2.80 Ga which closely matches with the dominant monazite Th-U-Pb age from the pelitic granulite (Mahapatro et al, 2012;Bose et al, 2013). The timing of the M 1 event is still uncertain, but it must be older than 2.80 Ga based on available textural and field relation criteria and limited geochronological data .…”
Section: Rng 62bsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…However, the implication of such high-P metamorphic event was not explored further in their study. A recent study by Mahapatro et al (2012) on pelitic granulite enclaves from the same area did not report any high-pressure metamorphism. These workers identified biotite dehydration melting to produce metapelitic granulite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…1a) where the lithology is dominated by a vast body of ca. 2800 Ma granitoid gneiss (Misra et al, 2000;Crowe et al, 2001;Mahapatro et al, 2012;Bose et al, 2016), referred to as the Pal Lahara gneiss (Saha, 1994). This vast body also contains dismembered bodies of amphibolites and granulites and is interpreted to have formed along the Singhbhum Craton margin during the Neoarchean time (Misra et al, 2000;Crowe et al, 2001).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Mafic granulites from the eastern part of the Central Gneissic Belt indicate a high-pressure (11-12 kbar) metamorphism followed by cooling and decompression to mid-crustal level (Bose et al, 2015). Pelitic granulite, on the other hand, records much lower pressure (6-8 kbar) granulite metamorphism (Mahapatro et al, 2012;Bose et al, 2015).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation