2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9666-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Archaeologies of Internment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another branch of this archaeological research focuses on prisoners of war and includes-very pertinently for this paper-graffiti (Oliver & Neal 2010a; Burton & Farrell 2013). Some of these studies indicate the creativity and agency of prisoners of war; others study slave labour and its material remains (Myers & Moshenska 2011;Mytum & Carr 2012, 2013. In short, it is a cliché worth repeating: archaeology through objects can shed new light on the grand narratives of the twentieth century (Olivier 2003;Schofield 2005), and such stories can be told because of the memories that objects hold (Olsen & Pétursdóttir 2014;Olsen & Witmore 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another branch of this archaeological research focuses on prisoners of war and includes-very pertinently for this paper-graffiti (Oliver & Neal 2010a; Burton & Farrell 2013). Some of these studies indicate the creativity and agency of prisoners of war; others study slave labour and its material remains (Myers & Moshenska 2011;Mytum & Carr 2012, 2013. In short, it is a cliché worth repeating: archaeology through objects can shed new light on the grand narratives of the twentieth century (Olivier 2003;Schofield 2005), and such stories can be told because of the memories that objects hold (Olsen & Pétursdóttir 2014;Olsen & Witmore 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%