2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45480-1_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architecture-driven, Multi-concern and Seamless Assurance and Certification of Cyber-Physical Systems

Abstract: Unlike practices in electrical and mechanical equipment engineering, Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) do not have a set of standardized and harmonized practices for assurance and certification that ensures safe, secure and reliable operation with typical software and hardware architectures. This paper presents a recent initiative called AMASS (Architecture-driven, Multi-concern and Seamless Assurance and Certification of Cyber-Physical Systems) to promote harmonization, reuse and automation of labour-intensive cer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has led to the emergence of multiconcern assurance and coassurance, where two or more dependability concerns, including safety, security, reliability, and the like, are considered at the same time in an integrated manner during software assurance activities. 3 The need for the integration of assurance activities capable of addressing the wide range of concerns of software-intensive systems throughout the software development lifecycle (SDLC) was identified in several ongoing and recently completed, large-scale, collaborative (academic and industry) research and development projects. In particular, architecture-based and argumentation-based approaches have contributed fundamental research that, although not directly targeted, are also applicable to deliver assurance artifacts.…”
Section: The Emergence Of Multiconcern Assurancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to the emergence of multiconcern assurance and coassurance, where two or more dependability concerns, including safety, security, reliability, and the like, are considered at the same time in an integrated manner during software assurance activities. 3 The need for the integration of assurance activities capable of addressing the wide range of concerns of software-intensive systems throughout the software development lifecycle (SDLC) was identified in several ongoing and recently completed, large-scale, collaborative (academic and industry) research and development projects. In particular, architecture-based and argumentation-based approaches have contributed fundamental research that, although not directly targeted, are also applicable to deliver assurance artifacts.…”
Section: The Emergence Of Multiconcern Assurancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with requirements of different kind (safety, security, performance), industrial and academic partners collaborated on several projects including MERgE [2], Sesamo [3], CRYSTAL [6]. While most of these projects considered the relation between safety and security, some also added performance to the scope like, for example, SAFURE [8], AMASS [29], EVITA [1] and AQUAS [4].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure modes are assigned to ports by defining failure mode groups based on domain [16]. SafeConcert is implemented in CHESS toolset [51] developed within CHESS [52] and Concerto [53] projects and has been included within recently released, open-source AMASS platform for certification [54]. This toolset offers modelling and analysis capabilities targeting high integrity systems as well as socio-technical systems.…”
Section: Chapter 2 Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%