Architecture, Economic Imaginaries and Urban Politics: The Office Tower as Socially Classifying Device

Abstract

In recent studies on the role of architecture in urban restructuring, city marketing and the related struggles for meaning, there has been a focus on high‐profile architects and iconic architecture. In this article I wish to examine architecture and building types as ‘socially signifying devices’, in order to take more everyday buildings and their images into account as well. Using Vienna as a case study, I explore how the commercial office tower is utilized to represent the internationalization of the local economy and render new urban political‐economic strategies socially meaningful. This is done by examining recent shifts in urban policy, and the means, channels and practices of discursive and visual representation of the local office architecture. Connecting the concept of economic imaginaries from cultural political economy (CPE) with a sociological approach to building types, I argue that economic imaginaries gain in plausibility if they are discursively and visually anchored in urban space. However, it is also shown that this kind of spatialization of new economic imaginaries is constructed on a selective visual representation of buildings: the assignment of international economic activities to local office towers is revealed to be only partially true in the case of Vienna.

La producción de los espacios de la ciudad global: planificación estratégica, megaproyectos y las "necesidades" de mercado inmobiliario

“…5) propone que la historia de la planifi cación urbana debe ser referida y se escribe como "historias de planifi cación transnacionales", mientras las ciudades deben entenderse "no en relación con una, sino dos o más sociedades" (King, 2004: 82). Un resultado de estos procesos es la aparición de la torre de ofi cinas "como un dispositivo de clasificación social" (Grubbauer, 2014, traducción del autor), la producción de la arquitectura también se ha convertido en un importante campo de la normalización transfronteriza.…”

Sustainable urbanism in the age of Photoshop: images, experiences and the role of learning through inhabiting the international travels of a planning model

“…Materials, including images, videos and models are particularly important resources in the built environment industry. Materials are useful in part because moving ideas from the realm of the abstract to that of the lived and experienced requires giving them a spatial form (Grubbauer 2014). Similarly, experiences such as study tours can create opportunities for tangible interactions with new ideas, for instance by taking a ride on a light rail, or observing how a sustainable urban drainage system is incorporated into a neighbourhood.…”

Transnational building practices: knowledge mobility and the inescapable market

“…Perhaps one of the greatest controversies in the literature on globalization and buildings relates to the impacts of mobile knowledge on the maintenance of situated local (vernacular) design (Cole and Lorch 2003;Faulconbridge 2009;Grubbauer 2014;Moore 2013). While the debate is far from settled, one of the most important insights to date has been that local design practices are remarkably robust and that even apparently 'global' designs, such as the bungalow or skyscraper, have important local material and cultural manifestations (Bunnell 1999;Jacobs 2006;King 1984).…”