Proceedings of the 41st Annual Design Automation Conference 2004
DOI: 10.1145/996566.996731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architecture-level synthesis for automatic interconnect pipelining

Abstract: For multi-gigahertz synchronous designs in nanometer technologies, multiple clock cycles are needed to cross the global interconnects, thus making it necessary to have pipelined global interconnects. In this paper we present an architecture-level synthesis solution to support automatic pipelining of on-chip interconnects. Specifically, we extend the recently proposed Regular Distributed Register (RDR) micro-architecture to support interconnect pipelining. We formulate a novel global interconnect sharing proble… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first set of seven DFGs are extracted from MediaBench [16], then scheduled, bound, and placed in a 3×3 RDR-based architecture. The synthesis results for four different architecture-algorithm pairs, RDR/MCAS [7], RDR-Pipe/MCAS-Pipe [8], RDR-GRS/ILP [9] and RDR-GRS/RSS, are shown in Table I. The second and third column show the number of nodes and data transfers of the test case, respectively.…”
Section: B Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first set of seven DFGs are extracted from MediaBench [16], then scheduled, bound, and placed in a 3×3 RDR-based architecture. The synthesis results for four different architecture-algorithm pairs, RDR/MCAS [7], RDR-Pipe/MCAS-Pipe [8], RDR-GRS/ILP [9] and RDR-GRS/RSS, are shown in Table I. The second and third column show the number of nodes and data transfers of the test case, respectively.…”
Section: B Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the number of required wires and register pairs in RDR/MCAS is lower-bounded by the number of the maximum possible concurrent data transfers at a cycle. Later, an extension named the RDR-Pipe/MCAS-Pipe is proposed in [8]. RDR-Pipe allows data transfers with the identical source-destination pair to share the same wires by inserting extra pipeline registers as intermediate stops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, since the feature size of CMOS devices is continuously decreasing and more functionality is integrated on a chip, the length and number of global interconnects tend to increase [7]. Consequently, in future nanometer designs it will be impossible to carry signal across the chip within a single clock cycle and multi-cycle cross-chip communication becomes necessary, so that cross-chip interconnect is removed from all the timing constraints, and the chip speed is determined by the most critical intra-block/local combinational path, in order to continue employing higher frequencies [4], [5]. Insertion of sequential elements in interconnects lines -a concept that has become known as interconnect pipelining − is one feasible solution for modern nanometer technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], a floor-planning methodology, which considers interconnect pipelining and its impact on performance using the IPC sensitivity models is described. The authors of [5] explored the possibilities of sharing interconnect pipelining to reduce wiring overheads. And, [6] provides two techniques to deal with the short path constraint of latch based wire pipelining.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanometer scale process technologies enable integration of billions of transistors with multiple-gigahertz operating frequencies [4]. However, continuous shift towards design in nanometer scale has been increasing the gap between device and wire delays, especially the global interconnect delays, which do not scale well with the feature size [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%