2018
DOI: 10.1111/joa.12864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architecture of structures in the urogenital triangle of young adult males; comparison with females

Abstract: The fibro‐muscular architecture of the urogenital triangle remains contentious. Reasons are small size of the constituting structures and poor visibility with most imaging methods. We reinvestigated the area in serial sections of three males (21–38 years old) of the American and Chinese Visible Human Projects and two 26‐week‐old male fetuses, and compared the findings with earlier observations in females. The mass of the levator ani muscle was approximately twofold smaller and its funnel shape steeper in males… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(174 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, Akita and colleagues argue that description of the perineal body as a node is a too delimited description and should, instead, be considered a region (Muro et al, ). However, our description of the perineal body as a fibromuscular structure in the wedge‐shaped space between the lower portion of the rectum and the vagina or urethra (“region”) that penetrates with many antenna‐like extensions between the fibers of the rectourethral muscle (“shape”) (Wu et al, ; Wu et al, ; Wu et al, ) is not very different from the impression that emanates from their trichrome‐stained illustrations of the rectourethral muscle (Muro et al, ). We, therefore, conclude that, not uniquely, both groups describe the same observation with different terminologies.…”
Section: New Findingsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, Akita and colleagues argue that description of the perineal body as a node is a too delimited description and should, instead, be considered a region (Muro et al, ). However, our description of the perineal body as a fibromuscular structure in the wedge‐shaped space between the lower portion of the rectum and the vagina or urethra (“region”) that penetrates with many antenna‐like extensions between the fibers of the rectourethral muscle (“shape”) (Wu et al, ; Wu et al, ; Wu et al, ) is not very different from the impression that emanates from their trichrome‐stained illustrations of the rectourethral muscle (Muro et al, ). We, therefore, conclude that, not uniquely, both groups describe the same observation with different terminologies.…”
Section: New Findingsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Consecutive sections of five female (CVH2, −4, −5, CVO and VHF (VHP female)) and five male specimens (CVH1, −3, VHM (VHP male), and two 26‐week fetuses (Leiden S2289 and S2600)) were studied in detail (Wu et al, ; Wu et al, ; Wu et al, ). We focused on the pelvic floor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations