2018
DOI: 10.1134/s0024490218060032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architecture of the Southern Marginal Zone of the Upper Jurassic–Valanginian Carbonate Platform of the Northeastern Caucasus (Dagestan, Shakhdag Massif)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of decametre-scale allochthonous blocks and submarine landslide deposits throughout the Cretaceous stratigraphy indicates a highly unstable margin ( Figure 12). Interpretations of basin-scale submarine landslide deposits, which partially form the Qizilqaya and Shahdag mountains farther west, further validates this interpretation (Bochud, 2011;Gavrilov, 2018) (Figure 14), with the mega-clasts in the west of the study area possibly forming part of this deposit (Figures 13-15). Similar onlap relationships to those formed as the Cretaceous stratigraphy infilled the irregular surface created by earlier submarine landslide deposits, have been observed elsewhere at outcrop (e.g., Armitage, Romans, Covault, & Graham, 2009;Burbank, Vergés, Munoz, & Bentham, 1992;Kneller et al, 2020) and in the subsurface ( Figure 16) (e.g., Casson et al, 2020;Soutter, Kane, & Huuse, 2018).…”
Section: Nature Of the Late Cretaceous Bathymetrysupporting
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The presence of decametre-scale allochthonous blocks and submarine landslide deposits throughout the Cretaceous stratigraphy indicates a highly unstable margin ( Figure 12). Interpretations of basin-scale submarine landslide deposits, which partially form the Qizilqaya and Shahdag mountains farther west, further validates this interpretation (Bochud, 2011;Gavrilov, 2018) (Figure 14), with the mega-clasts in the west of the study area possibly forming part of this deposit (Figures 13-15). Similar onlap relationships to those formed as the Cretaceous stratigraphy infilled the irregular surface created by earlier submarine landslide deposits, have been observed elsewhere at outcrop (e.g., Armitage, Romans, Covault, & Graham, 2009;Burbank, Vergés, Munoz, & Bentham, 1992;Kneller et al, 2020) and in the subsurface ( Figure 16) (e.g., Casson et al, 2020;Soutter, Kane, & Huuse, 2018).…”
Section: Nature Of the Late Cretaceous Bathymetrysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Submarine landslide thicknesses also increase towards this high in the Barremian, suggesting the high influenced deposition from the Early Cretaceous until the Turonian. Previous work has shown the presence of a large c. Early Cretaceous submarine landslide, composed of remobilised Late Jurassic blocks, towards the west (Figure 15) (Bochud, 2011;Gavrilov, 2018). The exact timing of this failure is uncertain, with Gavrilov (2018) suggesting this event may have occurred in the Late Cretaceous.…”
Section: Buduq Synclinementioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations