2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0032247414000552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arctic shipping insurance: towards a harmonisation of practices and costs?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Insurance premiums can fluctuate ad hoc, depending on ship type, age, past record of compliance with international laws, current operational standards, operational zones, and even the ship owner's bargaining power with the insurance company. Better infrastructural and navigational conditions, combined with a well-formulated emergency response mechanism in Russia, could lead to a reduced premium rate [44]. Even a 10% cut in the premium rate could have a significant effect on the total profit that favors the NSR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insurance premiums can fluctuate ad hoc, depending on ship type, age, past record of compliance with international laws, current operational standards, operational zones, and even the ship owner's bargaining power with the insurance company. Better infrastructural and navigational conditions, combined with a well-formulated emergency response mechanism in Russia, could lead to a reduced premium rate [44]. Even a 10% cut in the premium rate could have a significant effect on the total profit that favors the NSR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a common denominator is difficult to find since each voyage in Arctic waters is evaluated individually. According to a recent survey by Sarrabezoles et al (2016), most of the insurers stated that H&M premiums range between 25 and 50%, others estimated them between 0 and 25%, whereas only one assumed rates between 50 and 75%. As regards the P&I and cargo insurance premiums, these range from 0 to 25% most of the times whilst an almost equal number of respondents estimated cargo insurance premiums around 25-50%.…”
Section: Route Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also clearly indicated by the relatively high ranking attached to the 'Economic Factors' sub-criterion of 'insurance' (ranked 7 overall), because of the fact that premiums for insurance cover will certainly increase with greater exposure to the higher risks associated with Arctic shipping (UK P&I Club 2016) and the fact that the cost of H&M insurance will certainly increase relative to the cost of P&I insurance (Meng, Zhang, and Xu 2017). There is evidence to suggest, however, that the scale of additional insurance costs may pose more of a problem in perception rather than actuality, and that this might provide a perceptual deterrent to the expansion of Arctic shipping movements (Sarrabezoles, Lasserre, and Hagouagn'rin 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%