2015
DOI: 10.1186/s40164-015-0011-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Australian clinicians monitoring medication adherence in hematological cancer survivors? Two cross-sectional studies

Abstract: BackgroundHematological cancer survivors are growing in number and increasingly rely on oral therapy. Given known poor outcomes associated with non-adherence and previous evidence that many patients do not fully adhere to their treatment regimen, this study aimed to determine the degree to which clinicians monitor adherence to oral medication in hematological cancer survivors.MethodsData was combined from two cross-sectional surveys of a heterogeneous sample of 431 hematological cancer survivors recruited from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Survivors with clinician consent were then requested by the registry for written consent to pass on their contact details to the researchers. Details of these procedures are reported elsewhere …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survivors with clinician consent were then requested by the registry for written consent to pass on their contact details to the researchers. Details of these procedures are reported elsewhere …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survivors with clinician consent were asked to provide informed consent for the registry to pass on their contact details to the researchers. These methods are described elsewhere [28].…”
Section: Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haematological cancer survivors were identified and recruited from one Australian state population-based cancer registry. The standard recruitment methods employed by this registry were used, which are reported in detail elsewhere [31]. Briefly, eligible survivors were identified by registry staff and consent was sought from each eligible survivors' clinician to approach their patient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%