Are claims of non-inferiority of Internet and computer-based cognitive-behavioural therapy compared with in-person cognitive-behavioural therapy for adults with anxiety disorders supported by the evidence from head-to-head randomised controlled trials? A systematic review

Abstract

Objective: This review examines the evidence from head-to-head randomised controlled trials addressing whether the efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorders in adults delivered by computer or online (computer- and Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy) is not inferior to in-person cognitive-behavioural therapy for reducing levels of symptoms and producing clinically significant gains at post-treatment and at follow-up. A supplementary aim is to examine the evidence for severity as a moderator of the relative efficacy of computer- and Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy and in-person cognitive-behavioural therapy. Method: PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Cochrane database of randomised trials were searched for randomised controlled trials of cognitive-behavioural therapy for these disorders with at least an in-person cognitive-behavioural therapy and Internet or computer cognitive-behavioural therapy arm. Results: A total of 14 randomised controlled trials (9 Internet, 5 computer) of cognitive-behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder, panic disorder and specific phobia and 3 reports of effect moderators were included. One study showed a low risk of bias when assessed against risk of bias criteria for non-inferiority trials. The remaining studies were assessed as high or unclear risk of bias. One study found that Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy was superior and non-inferior at post-treatment and follow-up to group in-person cognitive-behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder. One study of Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy for panic disorder showed non-inferiority to individual in-person cognitive-behavioural therapy for responder status at post-treatment and one of Internet cognitive-behavioural therapy for panic disorder for symptom severity at follow-up. Other comparisons (22 Internet, 13 computer) and for estimates pooled for Internet cognitive-behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder, Internet cognitive-behavioural therapy for panic disorder and computer-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy studies did not support non-inferiority. Evidence of effect moderation by severity and co-morbidity was mixed. Conclusion: There is limited evidence from randomised controlled trials which supports claims that computer- or Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders is not inferior to in-person delivery. Randomised controlled trials properly designed to test non-inferiority are needed before conclusions about the relative benefits of in-person and Internet- and computer-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy can be made. Prospero: CRD420180961655-6

Telehealth mental health services during COVID-19: summary of evidence and clinical practice

“…9,10 In contrast, a systematic review found that there was no substantive evidence iCBT was equally beneficial to in-person CBT for anxiety disorders. 11 There is good evidence for the efficacy of online-delivered interpersonal psychotherapy, 12 acceptance and commitment therapy 13 and psychodynamic approaches. 14 Although these approaches can be self-guided, therapist support makes a substantial difference in terms of adherence, completion and efficacy.…”

The Evolution of Telepsychiatry for Substance Use Disorders During COVID-19: a Narrative Review

“…Nevertheless, individuals with serious mental illnesses can struggle to connect cognitively and emotionally during telehealth sessions with their counsellor [ 68 ]. Another systematic review of 14 RCTs of iCBT found no substantive evidence that iCBT was equally beneficial for patients with anxiety disorders as in-person services [ 69 •], starkly contrasting previously described research [ 30 •, 31 ]. It is also important to consider that more than 40% of the most rural USA counties do not have the necessary broadband infrastructure to support video based telehealth [ 46 ].…”

Exposure‐Based Writing Therapies for Subthreshold and Clinical Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

“…However, we were unable to identify further studies within the review's inclusion criteria that compared Interapy to active comparison conditions. Although there is a growing body of evidence showing the efficacy of online CBT‐informed interventions for various mental health conditions compared to waitlist conditions (Adelman et al., 2014), there remain significant methodological limitations in the literature for its efficacy in comparison to in‐person CBT (O'Kearney et al., 2019). Despite this, online delivery offers many advantages, including better accessibility and reduced costs (Andrews et al., 2018).…”