2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111209
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are facial width-to-height ratio, 2D:4D digit ratio and skeletal muscle mass related to men dominant behavior in the Chicken Game?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was supported by multiple human studies linking male facial width, typically measured as facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR, Fig. 1a) (Weston et al, 2007), to dominance (mostly self-reported or inferred, but also estimated from military rank and economic game outcomes) (Geniole, Denson, Dixson, Carré, & McCormick, 2015; Polo et al, 2022) and aggression (Goetz et al, 2013; Haselhuhn, Ormiston, & Wong, 2015; Stirrat et al, 2012; Třebický, Havlíček, Roberts, Little, & Kleisner, 2013; Wen & Zheng, 2020; Zilioli et al, 2015). Wider faces are also perceived as more dominant (Alrajih & Ward, 2014; Lefevre & Lewis, 2014; Mileva, Cowan, Cobey, Knowles, & Little, 2014), acting as cues or even signals of individual dominant/aggressive personality traits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This was supported by multiple human studies linking male facial width, typically measured as facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR, Fig. 1a) (Weston et al, 2007), to dominance (mostly self-reported or inferred, but also estimated from military rank and economic game outcomes) (Geniole, Denson, Dixson, Carré, & McCormick, 2015; Polo et al, 2022) and aggression (Goetz et al, 2013; Haselhuhn, Ormiston, & Wong, 2015; Stirrat et al, 2012; Třebický, Havlíček, Roberts, Little, & Kleisner, 2013; Wen & Zheng, 2020; Zilioli et al, 2015). Wider faces are also perceived as more dominant (Alrajih & Ward, 2014; Lefevre & Lewis, 2014; Mileva, Cowan, Cobey, Knowles, & Little, 2014), acting as cues or even signals of individual dominant/aggressive personality traits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%