1998
DOI: 10.1007/s004280050141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are giant ganglia a reliable marker of intestinal neuronal dysplasia type B (IND B)?

Abstract: It has been suggested that giant ganglia are a marker for a developmental bowel disorder, intestinal neuronal dysplasia of the submucosal plexus (IND B), diagnosed in a proportion of patients with severe intractable constipation. Diagnosis of this condition, however, remains controversial with a wide variation in the frequency of diagnosis in different centres. Our aim was to assess the frequency with which giant ganglia could be found in the bowel of individuals who did not give a history of life-long constip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the existence of this disease entity is open to controversy [2,8,9] because the criteria for this diagnosis have been defined based merely upon observations in patients with bowel motility disturbances. Furthermore, no age-related reference data from unaffected controls are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the existence of this disease entity is open to controversy [2,8,9] because the criteria for this diagnosis have been defined based merely upon observations in patients with bowel motility disturbances. Furthermore, no age-related reference data from unaffected controls are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have challenged the dogma of giant ganglia as a diagnostic criterion: Lumb and Moore (66) have shown in an adult study the presence of up to 62% of ganglia with >7 neurons, making them a common feature. This clearly raises concerns that previous series included an unrepresentative cohort.…”
Section: Controversiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…INDB has been considered to be secondary to acquired phenomena caused by congenital obstructions or inflammation occurred during pre, peri or postnatal periods in humans [12,13,18,56,57] . Morphological findings suggestive of INDB have been observed in intestinal segments proximal to areas of intestinal atresia, rectal mucosal prolapse and ileostomy, intestinal intussusception, imperforate anus and necrotizing enterocolitis [56,58,59] . This secondary histopathologic response to a bowel obstruction has also been tested in experimental studies with conflicting results [6062] .…”
Section: Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%