2003
DOI: 10.1257/000282803322655446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Idle Hands the Devil’s Workshop? Incapacitation, Concentration, and Juvenile Crime

Abstract: This paper examines the short-term effect of school on juvenile crime. To do so, we bring together daily measures of criminal activity and detailed school calendar information from 29 jurisdictions across the country, and utilize the plausibly exogenous variation generated by teacher in-service days. We find that the level of property crime committed by juveniles decreases by 14 percent on days when school is in session, but the level of violent crime increases by 28 percent on such days. Our findings suggest … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
226
2
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
14
226
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…If there is a high probability that children are around the school area for a significant amount of time, this approach should be adequate. US evidence supports this strategy, since it reveals a concentration of crimes committed by youth in periods immediately after school hours, when children/adolescents are still likely to be near the school (Snyder and Sickmund, 1999, Jacob and Lefgren, 2003, and Gottfredson and Soulé, 2005. The system of allocation of students to schools in São Paulo also supports our approach, as children are expected to study in the closest school available.…”
Section: Unit Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If there is a high probability that children are around the school area for a significant amount of time, this approach should be adequate. US evidence supports this strategy, since it reveals a concentration of crimes committed by youth in periods immediately after school hours, when children/adolescents are still likely to be near the school (Snyder and Sickmund, 1999, Jacob and Lefgren, 2003, and Gottfredson and Soulé, 2005. The system of allocation of students to schools in São Paulo also supports our approach, as children are expected to study in the closest school available.…”
Section: Unit Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Anderson (2011), for example, documents declines in juvenile crime rates at the time of increase in minimum dropout ages across US states, while Berthelon and Kruger (2011) report reductions in crime and teenage pregnancy following a school reform in Chile that increased weekly school hours from 32 to 39. Jacob and Lefgren (2003) and Luallen (2006), the former exploiting variations in teacher in-service days and the latter teacher strikes, document that property crimes decline but violent crimes rise when youth are in school (see also Snyder andSickmund, 1999, andGottfredson andSoulé, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…incapacitation effects (Jacob andLefgren, 2003, andLuallen, 2006). 3 However, we also know that criminal behaviour peaks in the late teenage years.…”
Section: Empirical Set Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…School days may act to "incapacitate" juvenile offenders by placing them under the supervision of teachers, but conversely may act to "concentrate" motivated offenders and vulnerable victims (Jacob & Lefgren, 2003). The criminogenic effect of concentration may be particularly pronounced on the journey to and from school, when older children especially are often unsupervised.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%