2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spillovers from conditional cash transfer programs: Bolsa Família and crime in urban Brazil

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
1
11

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
64
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The income elasticity implicit in welfare programs in Brazil is -0.25 (Chioda, De Mello, and Soares 2012), in Colombia -0.4 (Camacho and Mejía 2013) and in the US -0.4 (Jacob and Ludwig 2010). The stronger effect we found is consistent with a higher propensity to commit crime in former inmates relative to welfare recipients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The income elasticity implicit in welfare programs in Brazil is -0.25 (Chioda, De Mello, and Soares 2012), in Colombia -0.4 (Camacho and Mejía 2013) and in the US -0.4 (Jacob and Ludwig 2010). The stronger effect we found is consistent with a higher propensity to commit crime in former inmates relative to welfare recipients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in fact is supported by recent studies in LATAM that point out that conditional cash transfer policies reduces criminality (e.g. Chioda et al 2012).…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Como bem documentado em Soares (2012), a maioria desses estudos apontam que o programa contribuiu para a redução do percentual de pessoas pobres e da desigualdade de renda. Alguns autores estudaram os efeitos do programa em outras dimensões, como: educação (Glewwe & Kassouf 2012, Silveira Neto 2010, saúde (AIBF-I 2007, AIBF-II 2012, trabalho infantil (Ferro & Kassouf 2005, Araújo et al 2010, criminalidade (Chioda et al (2016)), mortalidade infantil (Camelo et al 2009, Rasella et al 2013, etc. Em geral, esses estudos apontam resultados favoráveis ao programa.…”
Section: Revisão De Literaturaunclassified