2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-day criminal recidivism

Abstract: Abstract:We report that on any given day the number of inmates released from incarceration significantly affects the number of offenses committed this day, and we name this as first-day recidivism. Our estimates of this novel approach to study early recidivism are robust to a variety of alternative model specifications. We then show that first-day recidivism can be eliminated by an increase in the gratuity provided to prisoners at the time of their release. A simple cost-benefit analysis shows that increasing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result has important implications for state SNAP bans and for reentry policy in general. In fact, it is consistent with recent work by Munyo and Rossi (2015) showing that a disproportionate amount of recidivism happens on the first day of release and that first-day recidivism can be almost completely stifled by giving releasees a sufficient monetary stipend. Their work suggests that financial support can ease reentry.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…This result has important implications for state SNAP bans and for reentry policy in general. In fact, it is consistent with recent work by Munyo and Rossi (2015) showing that a disproportionate amount of recidivism happens on the first day of release and that first-day recidivism can be almost completely stifled by giving releasees a sufficient monetary stipend. Their work suggests that financial support can ease reentry.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…We find that the effect of pretrial detention on pretrial rearrest is a 26.1 percentage points reduction, even larger than that on total rearrest. This result is consistent with incapacitation explaining our estimated negative effect of prison on crime, and is in line with previous research that has provided evidence on the importance of this mechanism for crime prevention (see Buonanno and Raphael 2013, Barbarino and Mastrobuoni 2014, Munyo and Rossi 2015. However, we also find that pretrial detention increases post-trial crime by 7.1 percentage points, implying that post-release effects are likely to partly offset the incapacitation mechanism.…”
Section: Pretrial Detention Effects By Crime Type Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…contaminating the estimation of the effect by other events that took place well after or before the release (for a similar approach, see Munyo and Rossi, 2015). The final sample consists of 321 projects.…”
Section: Data Econometric Model and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%