Are In‐House and Outsourcing Innovation Strategies Correlated? Evidence from the European Agri‐Food Sector

Abstract

We analyse European agri‐food firms’ choices about innovation in‐house or through outsourcing and provide empirical evidence about the correlation between these strategies. The relationship between the innovation strategy and firm‐, industry‐ and innovation‐specific characteristics is analysed through a bivariate probit model, which uses firm data from the EFIGE Bruegel‐UniCredit dataset. Transaction cost, resource base and knowledge governance arguments are used to explain the choice of innovation strategy. Our results show that the decisions to innovate in‐house or through outsourcing are independent from each other. In addition, we find that several organisational characteristics such as communication systems, human resource practices and specialisation are likely to influence both strategies. Conversely, organisational characteristics such as the allocation of authority and the business network do not seem relevant in determining the innovation strategies of the European agri‐food sector.

Revisión de la medición de capacidades dinámicas: una propuesta de indicadores para el sector ovino

“…Bravo-Ibarra y Herrera (2009) consideraron que la gestión del conocimiento y las rutinas organizacionales establecen la capacidad de integración de la empresa y señalaron que una buena práctica es el uso de tecnología para transferir el conocimiento. Actualmente, los sistemas de tecnologías de la información proporcionan mecanismos para las decisiones de gestión estratégica (Petter, Delone, & McLean, 2012;Shahbazi, Haghshenas, Nassiriyar, & Sadeghzadeh, 2016) y para integrar conocimiento externo en las actividades de las organziaciones (Materia, Pascucci, & Dries, 2017).…”

Local Entrepreneurs’ Involvement in Strategy Building to Facilitate Agro-Food Waste Valorisation within an Agro-Food Technological District: A SWOT-SOR Approach

“…Various theoretical as well as empirical studies have investigated factors internal to a district and to its firms, and the role they play in shaping the innovation process [28,29].…”

“…Organizational features linked to the internal governance of firms also play an important role in promoting or hindering their innovative behavior [28]. The level of decentralization of decision-making inside the firm [44], for example, might explain its flexibility and adaptability to changing conditions in terms of internal governance.…”

Open innovation : the road to success in agrifood?

“…Haverkamp et al, 2010, Wever et al, 2012, Garbade et al, 2013, Sabidussi et al, 2014, Grekova et al, 2014, Scholten et al, 2015, Khodaei et al, 2016, Nuhoff-Isakhanyan et al, 2017 could not only contribute significantly to the scientific literature in the fields of transaction cost economics (e.g. Teece, 1986), the dynamic capabilities perspective (Nooteboom, 2004 andTeece, 2007) and the knowledge governance approach (Grandori, 2001, Foss et al, 2012, Gulati and Srivastava, 2014, Materia et al, 2017, but could also provide input to support innovative agrifood SMEs. In 2013, we published the book: 'Open Innovation in the Food Industry: An Evidence-Based Guide' and the NetGrow Toolbox, (Fortuin and Omta eds., 2014).…”