Are Islamic mutual funds exposed to lower risk compared to their conventional counterparts?

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to comparatively analyze the systematic, idiosyncratic and downside risk exposure of both Islamic and conventional funds in Pakistan to see which of the funds has higher risk exposure. Design/methodology/approach The study analyzes different types of risks involved in both Islamic and conventional funds for the period from 2009 to 2016 by using different risk measures. For systematic and idiosyncratic risk single factor CAPM and multifactor models such as Fama French three factors model and Carhart four factors model are used. For downside risk analysis different measures such as downside beta, relative beta, value at risk and expected short fall are used. Findings The study finds that Islamic funds have lower risk exposure (including total, systematic, idiosyncratic and downside risk) compared with their conventional counterparts in most of the sample years, and hence, making them appear more attractive for investment especially for Sharīʿah-compliant investors preferring low risk preferences. Practical implications As this study shows, Islamic mutual funds exhibit lower risk exposure than their conventional counterparts so investors with lower risk preferences can invest in these kinds of funds. In this way, this research provides the input to the individual investors (especially Sharīʿah-compliant investors who want to avoid interest based investment) to help them with their investment decisions as they can make a more diversified portfolio by considering Islamic funds as a mean for reducing the risk exposure. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first attempt at world level in looking at the comparative risk analysis of various types of the risks as follows: systematic, idiosyncratic and downside risk, for both Islamic and conventional funds, and thus, provides significant contribution in the literature of mutual funds.

Multidimensional Risk and Religiosity Towards Indonesian Muslims’ Sharia Investment Decision

“…Muslims' decision-making in the context of investing in Sharia assets is also negatively influenced by their risk attitude. Naveed, Khawaja, and Maroof (2020) stated that sharia investments have a lower risk exposure compared with conventional investments. Meanwhile, León and Pfeifer (2017) found that Muslims are less risk-taking in financial matters compared to those from other religions.…”

Determinants to adopt conventional and Islamic banking: evidence from Indonesia

“…Lack of study to compare Muslim motivation toward comparative study between conventional and Islamic banks. The other weakness of prior studies is more prone to examine a decision-making process, which mainly uses correlation and cross-sectional techniques such as surveys (Adil, 2021; Hassan et al , 2018; Naveed et al , 2020). Hence, fall to provide comprehensive results on Muslim behavior on Islamic banks even though some scholars found consumers more inclined to adopt conventional banks than Islamic banks in some Muslim countries.…”

Effect of corporate social responsibility performance on dividend pay-out: Role of corporate governance quality

“…This study creates a CG index comprising several governance rules in accordance with the SECP 1 ’s CG recommendations to examine the role of CG quality in the dividend distribution decisions of socially responsible enterprises. Previous studies, such as Samaha et al (2012) ; Javaid and Saboor (2015) , and Naveed et al (2020a) , developed a CG index that included a variety of governance mechanisms to assess the CG quality. Following the above studies, a comprehensive CG index is constructed where the higher total score represents the highest quality.…”