Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm: 463575 []
For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
AbstractPurpose -The main purpose of this study is to provide first-hand information regarding domestic labour/labourers in Egypt. The research investigates the information rights and needs of the vulnerable and marginalized groups of domestic workers in Egypt in terms of their thoughts, perceptions, attitudes, motivations, techniques, preferences, ways, tools, and problems they encounter using and accessing information. The study documents the many different characteristics of local domestic workers in Egypt that affect their use of and access to information.Design/methodology/approach -The methodology used here was an adaptive form of snowball sampling of a heterogeneous demographic group of participants in local domestic work in Egypt, used to select focus groups to explore a range of relevant issues.Findings -Demographically, this study showed that local domestic labour in Egypt, to a great extent, is occupied and performed by women and children, and the average age of the total interviewed participants was around 31 years. Over half of the participants were uneducated, followed by nearly a quarter who had no formal education, and then a small number had some primary education. This study concluded that a large number of participants were described as illiterate and non-skilled labourers. Participants' income proved that it was one of barriers to use of and access to information where a large number of participants were labelled as low-income workers. The information seeking behaviour profile of participants indicated a preference for verbal over written, informal over formal, and undocumented over documented information channels and sources in order to solve problems relating to their daily existence, using some helping tools and devices, especially cell phones. The most popular information sources mentioned and followed by participants were verbal information with friends, peers, and colleagues in neighbouring households either via telephones, especially cell phones, or face-toface meetings. TV, radio, newspapers, and magazines, respectively, were the most formal ...