2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are mobile and fixed broadband substitutes or complements? New empirical evidence from Italy and implications for the digital divide policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-2 log Likelihood (373.320) which means accept null-hypothesis that indicate model above with independent variables is Fitted with the data. As the value of (DF=2)=5.991 with significance p (0,001), then it means that nullhypothesis again is rejected that indicated education and employment have significant effect toward desire to use digital mobile scanner application [24] with total effect of 64 % (with Nagelkerke R2 approach) [25]. As of Goodness of Fit test, we obtained from Hosmer and Lemeshow Test 11.057 < (DF=5) = 11.0705 which indicated that nullhypothesis where the model is fit, is accepted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…-2 log Likelihood (373.320) which means accept null-hypothesis that indicate model above with independent variables is Fitted with the data. As the value of (DF=2)=5.991 with significance p (0,001), then it means that nullhypothesis again is rejected that indicated education and employment have significant effect toward desire to use digital mobile scanner application [24] with total effect of 64 % (with Nagelkerke R2 approach) [25]. As of Goodness of Fit test, we obtained from Hosmer and Lemeshow Test 11.057 < (DF=5) = 11.0705 which indicated that nullhypothesis where the model is fit, is accepted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Today, with free wifi coverage, cheaper internet subscriptions, and inexpensive digital devices, scholars have begun to assert that the majority of individuals, institutions, and countries have crossed the first stage of the digital divide. Policymakers are also of the opinion that expanding access to the internet will reduce the digital divide at this level (Quaglione et al, 2020;Reddick et al, 2020). Figure 1 depicts the attributes and levels of the digital divide.…”
Section: First-level Digital Dividesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to van Deursen and van Dijk (2019), the majority of policymakers believe that the digital divide will diminish as internet coverage expands throughout the country. In order to solve the problem, a recent study emphasises the importance of formulating policies that can expand internet coverage (Quaglione et al, 2020;Reddick et al, 2020). Nevertheless, according to the findings of van Deursen and van Dijk's (2019) study, the digital divide will continue to exist as a result of the development of technology from a material access standpoint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these inequalities are to a certain extent concealed by the diffuse of mobile Internet infrastructure, the quality and affordability of mobile broadband remain significantly limited. Existing evidence indicates that mobile Internet services rather complement than substitute fixed broadband network (Quaglione et al 2020). A positive sign is that developing and LDCs are deploying the most advanced fiberoptic infrastructure, leap-frogging obsolete technologies such as cable and DSL networks (ITU 2018b).…”
Section: Icts Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%