This investigation explores the impact of geographical names within article titles on citation frequency across a corpus of literature within the field of library and information science, spanning from 2018 to 2020, and encompassing sixty-one journal titles. We hypothesized that the presence of geographical names of nations in article titles would negatively correlate with citation frequency. Our primary analysis of 1484 articles with geographical names versus 11652 without, revealed a statistically significant, albeit small, difference in median citations, favoring articles without geographical names (mdn = 7) over those with geographical names (mdn = 6). Contrary to our secondary hypothesis, a proximity analysis demonstrated a weak, positive correlation between the closeness of geographical names to the title end and citation counts. Additionally, our examination found no evidence supporting differential citation frequency based on the Human Development Index (HDI) of the nations mentioned in titles, nor did the impact factor of the journal moderate the relationship between geographical names and citation frequency. A weak, negative correlation was discovered between the frequency of geographical names in journal titles and the journals’ impact scores, yet this was not statistically significant. Our data also suggested a vague positional preference for nations within titles, unrelated to HDI. Furthermore, the likelihood of journals publishing articles mentioning nations of varying HDI was found to be statistically insignificant. This study sheds light on the nuanced influence of title specificity, through geographical names, on scholarly communication and citation impact, indicating a slight preference for broader title phrasing in garnering citations.